I was inquiring with Sweet Angels PO about a newer girl who didn't seem to have reviews. The PO made a different recommendation to me. I think I am going to take the recommendation, but I was curious if anyone else had experience with this org recommendations.
Bay area or NoVa?
Pretty obvious from his reviews.
Some of us don't have vip. But I looked at his previous posts and he's in bay area. Also twoon is right about the PO clue. I'm so used to both "booker" and "PO" on different boards I completely glossed over that shit.
The reason why I asked is that theres a rumor but a very high probability one that Tia/Elena aka the flaky one from LA and of lovelyangels fame flaked out yet again on nor cal.
But they still have her listed (as well as doing doubles with her friend Sammy) on the site.
Soo....if the rumor is correct you either gonna get bait and switch for Tia/Elena...or recommended someone else.
Not sure wtf they gonna do with doubles tho.
-- Modified on 7/24/2023 12:00:42 PM
Yes, Bay Area.
Well it'd be interesting to know if you went for Tia.
But this particular org has shady practices so I definitely wouldn't take any recs from PO. I generally don't take recs from any PO but then I can ask guys who I know on a messenger and they will give me unbiased info usually fast.
Some POs can be soup nazi and force you to pick on a spot if your pick you want available, if that's the case I'd just decline and choose from another org. But sweetangels don't mind if you shop around.
Generally I always have x number of girls in mind I'd want to see. Unless I'm desperate and horny and no one is available, I go down my list and see if they are available.
Cheers
As we attempt to keep our monger linguistics standard, PO is now called 'booker'.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Yemv
Tia/Elena, as per my sources, has never made it to NorCal
Yet she is still listed on the website. She was supposed to start on the 22nd. Today is the 26th.
Why don't they take her ad down?
were advertised as starting on a certain date and didn't start until a week later. It's usually a little issue they have that we don't have called a "menstrual cycle." Sometimes, for touring girls, it can be a transportation problem. Other times, when they announce they are leaving, they get a flurry of days where they are booked solid, so they stay a few more weeks. These are all legit reasons to be late for a start date at the new org. (You do know that they make their own decisions about when and where to work, right? They don't take the ad down because she's still a "coming attraction." Are you impatient to see her, or what? If you don't want to see someone else to tide you over, rub one out tonight. Lol
This isn't the first time she has done this.
I don't think you understood me, per my sources, it's not that she is late. She isn't coming to nor cal at all.
The other two times she was advertised the first she never actually came just like this time. The second time I'm told she worked like a day and a half and bounced. All while ad was sill up
As a reminder, this is also a case of classic b&s. She is not available but customers want to book her. Booker suggests someone else as a switch. What's the purpose of keeping her Pic there even if booker herself admits she is not coming?
And yes, I was actually excited to see her and her tatted body, it's been a while. After this flakiness, fuck it. Done with her.
available when YOU want to see them, then your only option is to stick with trafficked girls. They don't have a free choice NOT to work. Kgirls work when they want. There is a well-known girl in LA that you cannot pre-book because her SOP is to get up in the morning, have coffee and breakfast and THEN tell the booker whether she will work that day or not. If she says "yes" the booker starts booking same-day appointments. If she says "no" and you are a regular, you will get a reply text from the booker saying, "Sorry, she's not working today." If not a regular, you will likely not get a response.
When she gets to four or five customers, that's it. Try a different day. Nevertheless, she is one of the most sought after Kgirls when she is not on a "vacation." Lol Low-volume girl with high TER review average.
Could you share which girl is this?
available when YOU want to see them, then your only option is to stick with trafficked girls. They don't have a free choice NOT to work. Kgirls work when they want. There is a well-known girl in LA that you cannot pre-book because her SOP is to get up in the morning, have coffee and breakfast and THEN tell the booker whether she will work that day or not. If she says "yes" the booker starts booking same-day appointments. If she says "no" and you are a regular, you will get a reply text from the booker saying, "Sorry, she's not working today." If not a regular, you will likely not get a response.
When she gets to four or five customers, that's it. Try a different day. Nevertheless, she is one of the most sought after Kgirls when she is not on a "vacation." Lol Low-volume girl with high TER review average.
Thank you for the message. I don't have vip to read it but I appreciate it.
He made the exact same statement about her on this board about 3 years ago and he was WRONG then and probably wrong now if he's still talking about her.
from seeing her, would you agree it's pure speculation on your part to challenge anything I say about Lyn at this point, if indeed, I am referring to Lyn in this post? The last time you saw her was, when, 2019? After talking with her during the time of "the great purge", I have a good idea WHY you got blocked, but out of respect for your veteran status here, I will not cause you further embarrassment, even though you seem to have an axe to grind. You can PM me if you want to know privately.
Why would I PM someone who thinks they know more than they know and who has a problem with the truth? And if I was worried about being embarrassed about being blocked, I never would have mentioned that fact in the first place. But I would be remiss not to offer kudos to you, grasshopper, for removing your erroneous (fake?) review of Taylor after I pointed out your apparent confusion about her boobs.
One review of Taylor, and it's still up. You must be confusing me with someone else. I don't remember being confused about her boobs (do you have a link about me commenting on her boobs?). I have NEVER asked to remove one of my reviews, but I admit that I have submitted several that were never approved because the link expired, but that's an occupational hazard of not submitting the review immediately after seeing a Kgirl. That makes my own review list longer than the one that is available to other members, because mine includes all reviews submitted, even if they were not approved, and includes all reviews written under aliases.
First you say it was fake, and then you say it was removed. It's still up, right where it has always been. Can you see who the confused one is? Once again, I don't have to embarrass you. You are fully capable all by yourself. Lol
She never made it to norcal but she had her Pic up for almost a week advertising her and her doubles. She hasn't worked a day here or an hour.
Finally sweetangels took her off the site. A week later knowing that she wasn't coming here. If I know she isn't coming here, the PO/org/Tiana knows a log time before that.
Of course you choose to ignore the fact she is as advertised here over last week and hasn't actually worked here.
Ie, bait and switch.