I did a search about MC and came up with this blog called...The Accused Madam where she put up excerpts from the indictment against MC.

One excerpt stands out in my opinion.

#29 - "Miami Companions employees could access the database in order to "verify" the johns when the johns called to schedule an appointment with one of the women. Miami Companions employees could enter information regarding appointments and new clients to the database. The database was password-protected, and security features were used to prohibit employees from being able to copy or delete the database. Some of the employees of ITI Technical Solutions Inc. knew that Miami Companions was a prostitution business, and these employees assisted defendants GREG CARR, and LAURIE CARR and Miami Companions in the operation of the prostitution business by, among other things, assisting in adding security features in order to hide the database from law enforcement, designing the calendar to accommodate designations of appointments with various women working as prostitutes with johns in the South Florida area and in cities to which the women were traveling, and including a client database of tens of thousands of client names that included information about the clients' employment, contact information, and sexual likes and dislikes. In order to avoid detection by law enforcement, the database was hosted on a server in Panama, but was accessible from the United States through password-protected Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)."


If they were able to access that server then they have all of the info of people that used them....yikes. Not good.

I have no idea what information the Gov't has or doesn't have, but I know they are less likely to bust an independent provider.  It's one of the many reasons I prefer independents and haven't used an agency in years.

While they will surly access that database I think the Feds are focused on money laudrying and tax evasion.  There is some, but IMHO, not strong chance that they will spend any time trying to go after individuals of the service.

Jack

If they can link the handle to the person and the handle has reviews then that proves something, No?

Just because your name is in a database does not imply anything, nor can that fact alone be used to prosecute you. They need evidence that a crime has been committed, and that doesn't exist, just as a TER membership cannot prove you have illegal sexual relations with women.....

Quoting from the opening TER agree/decline page: "Therefore, everything contained here is fiction and is for your entertainment and amusement only."