I have had to resubmit because I missed a field entry or two.  If you have read any of my reviews, they are not explicit in language but the story gets told. However, mine are generally fairly long in the juicy details section.

I am also curious about the short, almost no detail reviews being posted as well.  Some have been difficult to even tell what happened in the session.  Plus, I have noticed a lot of first-first reviews being posted too.  Still don't understand that.....

One other pet peeve I have is that some guys tend to write just one extremely long paragraph.  I hate reading those.  Break it up, guys, it's much easier to read!!!!!!

Swim

contact them as to why and they always give a reason-I correct it and resubmit and they have never rejected any resubmission of mine-I would say that obviously it's not the same person approving all reviews and acceptances will vary with each individual-I agree with Wilco-keep trying and good luck-1rob

Look for more consistency in the near future.  In the mean time, you can submit a problem report and that may clear it up.

some inconsistancy in what gets approved and what doesn't get approved.  If the workload is heavy during a particular time period, the reviewers will work quicker and more "less than adequate" reviews will slip through.