some reviewers' reviews: I've noticed that some guys have loads of reviews, but their numbers are all over the place- anywhere from 9s and 10s to 5s and 6s. And they aren't chronological.
I've also noticed that some guys' reviews start out with 6s and 7s and progress to 9s and 10s. This seems much more logical to me in that they've obviously found out how to get the kind of engagements they prefer after having learned from a few less-than-stellar experiences.
But the crazy all-over-the-board ones really make no sense- why on earth would you still book a mistake at 5/4 or whatever after 20-some-odd reviews?? Especially if you've also booked 8/9? You'd think you would have learned something about the experiences you prefer and how to book those.
But maybe I am missing something here. If I am, could someone please enlighten me? (Oh- and I'm not talking about guys who book dates with massage-only ladies after escorts. The low scores are for escorts, and are not nice or flattering reviews at all.)
I've also noticed some guys reviewing someone pretty low, but then the review text just raves about her, how beautiful she is, how wonderful she was, etc. What gives there??
The mysteries of review logic. I s'pose it's kinda like "hooker math". Lol!