with outcalls & FOR ME...
the demand for it was not enough
to justify keeping it on my website.
I'm ONLY INCALL again (except for dinner dates) so for ME,
I have the luxury of just answering the door
& I do NOT have to insist on a 2 hour minimum.
Good luck in your plan for your future,
it sounds like you have your head together.
Xoxo,
me
I wanted to get others thoughts on this.....lately, in several cities I've recently been in, I'm seeing many ladies with a 2 hr minimum for their time. Now, this is not a complaint as all ladies have the right to set their time and fees as they see fit.....but I always like to book a 1 hr appt the first time I meet with someone.
My reasoning is simple, sometimes 2 people just dont click, and why pay for 2 hours if a good time is not being had. Now I have been lucky to be very selective on who I have seen so my concern hasnt come up before, but the thought is always in the back of my mind.
If I see a lady for an hour, and we get along great, I have no issue going for the longer visit with her on future visits, so my concern is only for a first visit.
Thoughts?
Cheers
I will NOT book more than 1 hour with a NEW POTENTIAL client.
UNLESS we have ALREADY gotten to know each other
through Emails or phone calls or SOMETHING.
I understand that ladies have the right to set whatever mins they what but my take is that I do all my visits during the day since it is impossible to do anything in the evenings. I don't even consider providers with 2 hours mins because I can't find the time to be away from my office for that long of a block of time. On a few occasions I have had providers make exceptions but if that is what they want to do just move on to someone else. I know I can't be the only one with time issues.
I agree with the sentiments that have been posted from the previous posters. I personally refuse to see 2/hr minimum because I too feel that you can never account for chemistry, etc regardless of reviews.
From a purely economic standpoint, it's all dictated by free market dynamics, not just for minimum time (1hr vs 2hr etc) but also pricing. If at a higher rate/longer time minimum the provider can rake in more $ more efficiently, then that is what will happen. If they see business dwindling vs. the traffic they had with previous time/pricing, the provider will most likely make changes to accommodate.
I plan on going to vegas soon and there were a few girls out there who I had as must-see, but recently these girls not only hiked up their prices to $700/hr (+200hr vs previous price) but also established a 2hr min = $1400 which puts their pricing into 1hr with a top pornstar territory . Granted these providers have consistently great reviews, but with the plentiful choice in LV, there are many other providers who are easily as highly rated with all 9s and 10s (a certain blonde with initials KF comes to mind) who start 1hr a@ 500 - 600. To me, it's a no-brainer: TER data says you pretty much get the same quality, but at half the risk and price. If I am spending $1.5K on an outing, I'll go splurge on a top tier, highly-rated PS like Audrey Bitoni instead as I feel from my experience PS often provide a certain level or erotic debauchery that is hard to find and replicate.
In any case, my point here is that market is dictated by what the clients in the market choose to do. As someone with an econ major, I as a consumer will support the products/services that I believe provide the most value vs. investment not just for this hobby but for anything. In the end, we are all different in this regard i guess...
for two or more hours at a time.
I wonder how many guys stay for the full 2 hours. Some people just aren't that interesting, client and provider alike.
You be surprise I do have dates that stay a full 2 hrs....& plus I make sure they get his time well spend !!
Because This is all bout you !!!!
and know that uncomfortable feeling myself. When a gentlemen asks for a longer first date I am always in suspense wondering how well we will get along. Good conversation on the phone and a few e-mails helps get some feel of the person but chemistry is something of a wait and see till you meet.
The one hour date is priced higher than the multiple hour date. If a gentleman wants to do more than one hour after we meet and I have the time I offer the better rate. On the gentleman's part he needs to be prepared.
Kisses Haley
I will only book 1 or 2 hrs on the first date, either is fine with me. I do not book longer time periods on the first date. I have had many requests for all nighters from prospective dates that I haven't met previously decline every time because I think any longer than two hours would not be worth the compensation if I do not click with the client in question.
I missed your posts Sweetheart.
It is a deal breaker for me. Every lady has a right to set her own rates and limits, but I will not pay for two hours when there is a chance that I will be leaving early due to lack of chemistry. There is a beautiful lady who I have not reached out to for this very reason. I never feel comfortable asking for a rate that is not published, nor do I negotiate or haggle. I feel it is bad form.
I think some girls set a 2 hour minimum as a disingenuous way to charge more money in the hopes that the client doesn't use the full time allotted. With that said, men are free to ignore such disingenuous ladies. I know I do.
My reasoning is simple, sometimes 2 people just dont click, and why pay for 2 hours if a good time is not being had. Now I have been lucky to be very selective on who I have seen so my concern hasnt come up before, but the thought is always in the back of my mind.
If I see a lady for an hour, and we get along great, I have no issue going for the longer visit with her on future visits, so my concern is only for a first visit.
Thoughts?
Cheers
the 1 hour ladies do the same thing. But what I have noticed more is that the 2 hour ladies tend to have higher expenses ( better incalls) and are way more about the connection than about just the sex. Now this is from reading reviews not my personal experience. But it is their right to set the paramiters of the visit.
Yes, the same could be said about 1 hour girls vs. 30 minute girls , 30 minute girls vs. 15 minute girls , and so on.
But we're talking about minimum appointment times here. I think a 1 hour minimum is certainly acceptable and offers greater flexibility to clients, while 2 hours is mostly disingenuous on the girls part. Let the clients decide for themselves if they want a 2 hour date without requiring that clients make a 2 hour minimum commitment.
From the guys perspective: If your objective is merely to try out the goods, check the block and hit the drive thru before heading back to work, then 1hour girls are the way to go. But if you are more about enjoying the experience, you can't do that in an hour. Shoot ....hard to in 2 hrs.
Ladies Perspective (or at least what I was told): in order to stay low volume, the prep time efficiency is so much better with 2 hours than 1 hour. You are spending less time, and less wear/tear on your bodies.
But here is my perspective: I took a chance and scheduled a 3 hour first date....just had a good feeling. Dinner, then a most delectable desert afterwards. The "main course"....talking with her, getting to know HER, just made the desert sweeter. And, I'm sure it's why she is my ATF, and why I keep seeing her every 3-4 weeks.
Grabbing a cookie or a sweet has its place.....but enjoying the dining experience, with the desert being the last thing you remember, is so much richer.
Sometimes I require a two hour minimum to certain outcalls. If my drive is too long then i consider it not worth it to book 1 hour. I believe most women, if that is not the case....may consider your request even if their ad or website says 2 hour minimum, but if you do not ask, you will not get. I am going to enter back into the professional world soon and when I do I am going to become very much more selective and require two hour minimums....because I am only going to book a few people a week. There is a large picture for everything. Maybe some women, even though they do this for a living, have that requirement because they need it so they can feel comfortable and get to know you, etc. You hit the nail on the head when you said it is their decision...and that decision is not always out of greed but what works for their carreer, life, family, selectivity, etc. Those are my thoughts.
with outcalls & FOR ME...
the demand for it was not enough
to justify keeping it on my website.
I'm ONLY INCALL again (except for dinner dates) so for ME,
I have the luxury of just answering the door
& I do NOT have to insist on a 2 hour minimum.
Good luck in your plan for your future,
it sounds like you have your head together.
Xoxo,
me
I would even go shorter for a "meet and greet" if I can.
If we don't click, you can not force it. So then, I'm basically giving a "nice to meet you" tip.
I don't book more than 30 mins for the first visit. Afterwards, it's longer and more often (That's the BEST tip to give in my book).
The providers that click with me have the pleasure of multiple repeat visits and referrals (I AM top 10 reviewer). I enjoy their time and they enjoy mine so they're simply put into my budget. A couple, I've been 'friends" with for years.
My reasoning is simple, sometimes 2 people just dont click, and why pay for 2 hours if a good time is not being had. Now I have been lucky to be very selective on who I have seen so my concern hasnt come up before, but the thought is always in the back of my mind.
If I see a lady for an hour, and we get along great, I have no issue going for the longer visit with her on future visits, so my concern is only for a first visit.
Thoughts?
Cheers