I rarely go out on dinner dates, but enjoy when I do. I always like to have a little something to eat prior to sex, and a nice dinner out first creates a more memorable bond. Having said that, I am often hungry right after sex, and would just as soon go out afterwards for a bite to eat.
Does this mean she is not a provider? Perhaps a "sugar baby"? If this is the case, then too bad for you. She has absolutely no obligation to do what you want. And of course, you also have no obligation to compensate her in any "arrangement". If she were a provider, I can't imagine her making any such demands. Suggestions, perhaps, but not demands.
But honestly- regardless of how you two became acquainted, why on earth wouldn't you want her to be comfortable with the situation?? I'd imagine you want your fun with her more than she needs your "arrangement". Hopefully she realizes this.
I personally prefer to dine before the evening in begins. It's more natural, and the erotic tension builds enormously- especially if the conversation is flowing. Chemistry is created and later ignited. Looking at the person across the table from you, knowing that in just a little while longer they will be in your mouth... mmm. Pretty hot stuff.
Dinner doesn't have to be prime rib with baked potatoes. Keep it light- a nice seafood restaurant would be perfect. Or as was suggested, some good sashimi.
But for your purposes, maybe you could suggest dinner afterwards. It's a compromise- you both get what you want.
Posted By: trojanlarge
I recently meet this lady for an arrangement. She wants to go out to dinner and make it a real date. But I do not like to eat before sex. I am a sex on a empty stomach type guy. If dinner is a must then it is a no go for me. I have explained this to her and it is a downer for her. Said it makes her feel like a hooker. My thoughts only: well squack squack