CHICAGO (WLS) -- A Man is charged with sexually assaulting a woman he met on XXXXXXXX.com.

to not only try to avoid things like this happening but also to make sure we have info to be able to report the assultant.  There have been rapes, robberies, beatings, and even murders and not just by lower category providers and street walkers but also high end reputable ones as well.   It could happen to anyone.  I just hope she is ok and that the guy gets the time he deserves

I'm sure the millions of women who have been raped on dates knew their attackers name.

The coward decided to change his alias since he got ridiculed by many under the old one.

It's just not paying the fare, right?

Why should it matter where he met her or what she does for a living?

Probably the reason it's so difficult to arrest someone for sexual assault of a "sex worker" ... is because it would be so difficult from a legal perspective to prove there wasn't consent. Unless you get a flat-out confession like you have in this case.  

This is just a philosophical question I'm throwing out there for fun. Don't take this too literally.

Even *if* she pays no federal income taxes, that doesn't support the police.

the boarder illegally and get justice here without paying taxes, having insurance or anything then even a lady who doesn't pay into the system should get justice.  This is like saying a drug dealer who get shot down in the street doesn't deserve to have his killer caught and held accountable because he also was not paying taxes.  That idea is crazy.  The justice system is in place to help everyone be it they pay in or even are of a legal status.

I was just asking.

I'm honestly not surprised that the Sun Times would run such garbage.  Completely disgusting.

Yes, I agree kids are spoiled deadbeats.

Good points you make all around. Everyone ultimately pays taxes one way or another. Even the bratty kids.

I also sent an email of disgust to the paper. I couldn't find Mitchell's email although it is likely [email protected] although I did find the following email addresses for those interested:

If she cannot see that there's a world of difference between being violently assaulted vs. rendering full-service and then being denied payment obviously she is not very intelligent and has no business opening her mouth about such things.

Wait? You have a backyard ice rink? How fun!

rape tears.  If we are not turned on then there is no moisture and it rips our poor kitten to death.  As well most rarests are not condoms wearers, so between the presence of fluids and the tears it is pretty easy with a rape kit to tell if someone has been forced or not.

Let's take your argument to it's logical conclusion. Criminals are not entitled to protection by Law Enforcement ie, it's ok to simply murder all drug dealers, hookers, and of course people who cheat on their taxes, jaywalkers and lastly but hardly least, guys who see hookers.

Obviously it's in the interest of public safety that violent offenders be behind bars.

I'm about to get all teary eyed and patriotic...

Same goes for children, the unemployed, the homeless, charitable institutions, religious organizations, and everyone else who don't pay taxes. Why should they be entitled to protections funded by tax revenues? What a great idea. Think of the savings the "taxpayer" will enjoy when we cut public services because there will be less of a need for them with so many people excluded from their protection. I'm sure by now you realize how utterly preposterous your "philosophical question" is, unless of course you're a member of the Aryan Nation or a Tea Party radical.

All would have been consensual had the hobbyist kept up his part of the transaction. So this is more of a case of "no means no, because I wasn't paid".  There are tons of fantasy in this game and he could always claim role playing with the gun and the like.  Might work as a defense.  

......to then insult the hell out of the person/party to whom he is speaking.  

This seems like a topic you're very passionate about.

When you are a hammer, all the world is a nail.  

Hahahahaha.

What you just stated is that in a high-risk activity it is not shocking for a provider to be assaulted, yes?

Own up to the fact that you've chosen a career path that carries with it some danger and risk.

Isn't this why it's high time we take another look at the logic behind the prohibition of this activity, which clearly is as much of a failure as was liquor prohibition in the 1920s. If the activity were legal all the women would have the recourse they would need to report such violent activity. Maybe I have watched too many episodes of shows such as Criminal Minds, but I feel excessive violence against street hookers is every bit as horrifying as those against more mainstream types. The reason there is more of it is because they are usually willing to take more risks than are most mainstream women, who have long ago wised up to some of the tricks of the trade. Perhaps the saddest part is that it make it that much harder for us to get legitimate dates in the mainstream.  

I have been semi-broke, or at least more than I would like to be, ever since having suffered a fall back in 2008, the same year the big recession screwed so many of us (in a different way). But I'm not about to go out and do these kinds of things to protest. You protest by blogging on forums meant to air out our frustrations over government and corporate policies, etc. And have any of you noticed that also we are told that there has been a big drop in crime in recent years, there seems to have been an increase in sexual assaults. Do any of you feel this is related to an entitlement ethic that many have developed among men back during our awakening years around the time of free love and singles bars?

It wasn't someone on this board, was it. If so, he should be barred from the board for life!

Where screening comes in, I fully admit that I do some screening of the ladies as well. They may be less prone to committing violent acts, but there are many that can rob us blind when least expecting it. Trying to screen out the "give 'em an inch and take a mile" type.

He obviously was looking for someone to assault rather than one to have a good time with, don't you think?

Amen! This is a reason why we should, if not totally legalize, then at least decriminalized the activity, just as we did first with gambling and now, more recently, are starting to do with at least small amounts of pot. Then the women could report said violent activity without fear of negative reprisal.

But don't forget the old adage that "There for the grace of God go I". Meaning that anyone could fall into poverty, especially in recessionary times such as ours where companies are often very ruthless about cutting people from their payrolls. It could even happen to you someday. Some can rise above poverty, but many are not as lucky. You can make a case of being at fault if you are a druggie or an alkie, but certainly there are many upstanding people who just don't happen to have beaucoups of money at their disposal. I don't, and have to really save and scrimp for a long time to be able to participate in this venture maybe once every nine months or so.

But police officers themselves are often guilty of hurting women, and spousal abuse is common among them. There are good and bad ones just like there are good and bad car mechanics.

Can't help but noticing that the person you directed this post to withdrew from this discussion, so we still don't know her answers. But I do believe that, for the most part, this so-called "hobby" is only affordable to the top 15 percent or so of the income spectrum. Someday I hope it will be affordable to more. Maybe once it becomes officially legal, which I believe it should be. Streetwalking, no.

That was the original dream of communism, to create a world where there wouldn't be the need for a police force. But yet they were police states themselves. Since the 911 attacks we have somewhat moved in that direction as well.

Who is/was Walter White? You could say the same about Jack Ruby, couldn't you? He couldn't wait for the government to execute Lee Harvey Oswald so he took matters into his own hands. It proved that two wrongs don't make a right, as he was sentenced to death but died of natural causes first.

This is why so many ask for it upfront. But you have to be careful with whom you do that, because there are many that will, as in the classic Steve Miller song, "Take the money and run", giving the client absolutely nothing. Yes, those "Give 'em an inch and they will take a mile" types do exist. Yet in most restaurants other than fast food joints you don't pay for your meal until after you have eaten.

Any career path contains a degree of risk. Just think of all the football players who suffered concussions that drove them to the point of suicide. And the doctors who are prone to getting sued if their surgeries aren't as successful as they should be.

I have nothing but the utmost appreciation for this rant. Hopefully sometime I can spend some time with you commiserating on the entitlements to freeloaders in this day and age

She seems to not realize the constitution guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. Not just frigid, suburban trophy wives who need to drink a bottle of wine and swallow 5 valiums to get through their once-monthly sexual encounter with the rich husband they can't stand.

BRILLIANT responds back!

Are you saying that if someone doesn't pay taxes, we have the right to kill them?

Don't you believe that, by screening, that the ladies are doing their part to make it safer? One of my soapbox subjects, it applies to mainstream dating as well. A few nutjobs ruin things for all the rest of us, and in some ways make us all suspect.

May take you up on it if you will start with the biggest soapbox approach. Can't say I will entirely agree, however, but you may try me out.

I do report my income, but more importantly I have a nice house and pay more in property taxes than the full rent of a decent apartment.  So yeah, I put in my share.

Wow, this quote doesn't make you sound like a spoiled Barbie Doll at all ....