They have newer photos on their sites, why are they posting old photos on new advertisements here on the board.  What gives ladies?  This seems dishonest to me. Opinions?
Doc

If they are still pretty accurate it doesn't matter if they are a couple years old or not.

some are "pretty accurate" but not compared to the other more recent  photos found on the ladies sites.  So why advertise with your older pics.

The purpose is deception.  Is it more complicated than that?

You should qualify your response by stating that it doesn't matter to YOU - it matters to me.

i agree with the accuracy point, and also...sometimes the pic is memorable and fantasies are brought back to life......then old friends come out of the 'wood'work

I have had issue with this for awhile.  Not just here but on sites like RS2K, some of the ladies constantly recycle old ones and put "photo updates". Basically they changed it back to older photos that are sometimes 2-3 years old. In some cases providers have their original photos up from when RS2K started......it's baffling. I had an experience a couple of years ago where I booked an appointment and the provider looked nothing like the photo's....maybe at one point she did. Personal rule: I never see anyone who doesn't update their photo's at least 3 times a year.

Seeing as how my pesponse was only from me, I'd say that in itself is a qualifier. That's why more than 1 person is allowed to post repilies to a thread, so everyone can get their 2 cents in ya idiot

If they are not accurate anymore then I don't believe they should be used.

well it's not "clearly deception" if the provider is obviously a true lasting provider that throws one in once in awhile BUT still looks the same...those that state "pic update" and it was them prior to giving birth a couple of times, well they apparently are on some other sh**!!  lol but...if it's a provider that has been around long enough for you to know she has a "variety of pics" why would you assume deception?  more like lazy........

Hell, when I cleaned out all of my old stuff from my mother's attic last year, I discovered I can still fit into some of the dresses I wore in middle and high school. Simply put, my body hasn't changed.

Nor has my face, save for a bit of thinning out over the years (an improvement in my book). When an interested gentleman asked a particular lady friend what my face looks like, her literal response was "like she's 14." A bit of an exaggeration, I think, but at 29 I surely do still get carded everywhere I go, and most people think I'm around 22.

So, my dear, here's my question to you-the photos on my site range from 7 years old to 2 months old. If they weren't in chronological order, would you really be able to tell which are which? If the photos are not deceptive, and her TER appearance reviews are high enough for whatever standards a particular gentleman may hold, I'm at a bit of a loss as to why the age of a photo should matter. Capturing the "right image" is really difficult. It's not just a matter of the photo being aesthetically pleasing, but also conveying the right "story." I don't "advertise" often, but I am always careful in selecting the right photo or collection of photos to tell the right story based on the type of gentleman I wish to attract. Due to my back history in artistic modeling, I have a handful of photos that convey these facets of me as good as some of my newer photos. As such, as long as they are not physically deceptive, I think they deserve valid consideration.