Get a better search engine, then....Re: Use the search function

Hey Bean, no kidding; use the search function!  Why didn’t I think of that?  On this site using a multitude of variables you'll come up with a deluded dataset...also, you don't know what particular variables I am looking for, i.e., location, availability, etc., including the standard definition of what was asked.   So, not to be a total PRICK, I took your advice once I created about 60 free minutes in my lazy day.  Here is what I did and this is what I found:

Search criteria used:

Location:  Chicago
Build:  Thin & Skinny
Height:  5’-0” – 5’-2”

Yes, I performed two searches, one for each Build variable.  And I only took the most recent dates, i.e., the first page of each search, both contained 15 records.  And because you’re so smart I’ll let you extrapolate the data for an appropriate projection with a standard +1 and -1 deviation.  Also, there is an indexing issue with the searches because there was one entry for June 6/2 smack dab in the middle of December 12/22 dataset.  And the other displayed three records out of sync as well.  I’d talk to the DBA and the ASP/HTML programmer about that.

The Results:

For the Skinny search 3 out of 15 records where 5’-2” or shorter, even though I specifically selected the height of 5’-0” – 5’-2”, it was ignored.  Out of those one had a bad URL, another one is not based here or in town, that leaves 1 out of 15 for a successful search rate of 6.667%...

For the Thin search 6 out of 15 where 5’-2” or shorter, even though I specifically selected the height of 5’-0” – 5’-2”, it was ignored.  Out of those one did not have a valid URL, 4 where Asians with the same agency.  That leaves you with one record that matches the criteria asked in my previous post.  BTW, this search had a success rate of 6.667% as well.

So when I am not on the run looking for some quick input from the community, hey, I’ll use the F@$^*#g search function.  Have a safe and Happy Holiday Season...