Chicago

That's exactly the problem
RussianWithLove 770 reads
posted
1 / 16

And so are a lot of reviewers.  There should be a "Petite" option to clear up a lot of the confusion.  In my opinion, this is what the terms mean.

Skinny ---- We are talking a model's body here.   You can clearly see a lot of the bone structure, especially in the rib cage.  There is not a lot of muscle but there is some tone.  Here is an example:
http://www4.pictures.stylebistro.com/fp/Maryna+Linchuk+Swimwear+Bikini+I-bK-7DR75sl.jpg
Ideally this body type should be called "Petite."  This is not "Thin."

Athletic----  Athletic does not mean "Thin" or the opposite of fat.  Athletic means the girl actually spends time doing Athletic activities besides fucking! Stop disrespecting the girls who enjoy a sport or activity or being in the gym by calling girls who are naturally thin athletic!  It takes time and commitment to create such a body and this term should be reserved for them.  Here is an example: http://images.colourbox.com/thumb_COLOURBOX3768422.jpg

Thin---   She is not petite.  She has a normal body but keeps it trim.  There is not a lot of body fat but she is not athletic.  Example: http://i4.minus.com/iIoRQqxkoRmt3.jpeg

Average----  In modern day, the average woman carries a bit of body fat.  This is just the norm.  Here is an example: http://www.look-fabulous.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/the-bikini.png

Very muscular--- This should be reserved for bodybuilder females only.

Baby fat---- fucking retarded.  Delete

Flabby---  Is thin in some parts and flabby in the mid section.   Here is an example: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/article6397395.ece/alternates/w460/'Muffin%20top'.jpg

Heavy----- Change to BBW.   Here:http://www.themagicofmothering.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Beautiful-Girl.jpg

Very Fat--- Anything bigger than BBW.

Please think before you review.  The quality of your experience should not influence the type of body you assign her.

IsorokuYamamoto 527 reads
posted
2 / 16

Who's put you in charge of this category? Your opinion rules? Just curious.  

Posted By: RussianWithLove
And so are a lot of reviewers.  There should be a "Petite" option to clear up a lot of the confusion.  In my opinion, this is what the terms mean.  
   
 Skinny ---- We are talking a model's body here.   You can clearly see a lot of the bone structure, especially in the rib cage.  There is not a lot of muscle but there is some tone.  Here is an example:  
 http://www4.pictures.stylebistro.com/fp/Maryna+Linchuk+Swimwear+Bikini+I-bK-7DR75sl.jpg  
 Ideally this body type should be called "Petite."  This is not "Thin."  
   
 Athletic----  Athletic does not mean "Thin" or the opposite of fat.  Athletic means the girl actually spends time doing Athletic activities besides fucking! Stop disrespecting the girls who enjoy a sport or activity or being in the gym by calling girls who are naturally thin athletic!  It takes time and commitment to create such a body and this term should be reserved for them.  Here is an example: http://images.colourbox.com/thumb_COLOURBOX3768422.jpg  
   
 Thin---   She is not petite.  She has a normal body but keeps it trim.  There is not a lot of body fat but she is not athletic.  Example: http://i4.minus.com/iIoRQqxkoRmt3.jpeg  
   
 Average----  In modern day, the average woman carries a bit of body fat.  This is just the norm.  Here is an example: http://www.look-fabulous.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/the-bikini.png  
   
 Very muscular--- This should be reserved for bodybuilder females only.  
   
 Baby fat---- fucking retarded.  Delete  
   
 Flabby---  Is thin in some parts and flabby in the mid section.   Here is an example: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/article6397395.ece/alternates/w460/'Muffin%20top'.jpg  
   
 Heavy----- Change to BBW.   Here:http://www.themagicofmothering.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Beautiful-Girl.jpg  
   
 Very Fat--- Anything bigger than BBW.  
   
 Please think before you review.  The quality of your experience should not influence the type of body you assign her.  

RussianWithLove 334 reads
posted
3 / 16

It shouldn't be up to opinion.  You already have a ranking for looks, which, by the way, people are terrible at.  Body types are not opinions.  They are used to differentiate and to label.  I have a body type.  It is a fact unless it changes by increasing or decreasing my body fat.  The more ambiguity we allow in these reviews, the worse it is for everybody.  Imagine going to buy a house and the listing said," A nice size house with enough bedrooms and bathrooms."  What have you learned that you can go on?  Absolutely nothing.  This is why we list square footage and the amount of rooms.  How is a house like a TER reviewed provider?  Even if you do your research, you still get fucked in the end.  All I'm asking for is a bit more clarity on the thing I enjoy spending my money on the most.

JoeAverageHobbyist 322 reads
posted
4 / 16

Most guys have no clue or else don't want to offend.  They end up categorizing a woman who is Heavy or a small BBW as Athletic, or one who is Average as Thin or Athletic.  Maybe TER needs to provide pictures as examples similar to what you did.  We'd still get it wrong though.

xe 234 reads
posted
5 / 16

Agree that it is in needs of the major improvement you list.  maybe face, body, experience or demeanor.  why no face value?  pussy description but no face description??  or how bout teeth and hygiene too?  i no like busted teeth on womans.

some providers are fat squatters when pics show nice and toned.  you know who they are.  one in particular it seems trades whitelist referrals for good ratings.  you know who this fat bitch is

MissErinBlack See my TER Reviews 303 reads
posted
6 / 16

I feel that's the most pertinent thing here. Basic categories are fine for search purposes, but as far as finding out about what a lady looks like, look at photos... Amiright?!

IsorokuYamamoto 319 reads
posted
7 / 16

Not trying to be difficult kinda new to the boards here not the hobby. But it's ALL so subjective to me. What's athletic to me may be thin to you. What curvy to you may be fat to you. In a reverse way kinda makes it interesting? Carry on haha!  

Posted By: RussianWithLove
It shouldn't be up to opinion.  You already have a ranking for looks, which, by the way, people are terrible at.  Body types are not opinions.  They are used to differentiate and to label.  I have a body type.  It is a fact unless it changes by increasing or decreasing my body fat.  The more ambiguity we allow in these reviews, the worse it is for everybody.  Imagine going to buy a house and the listing said," A nice size house with enough bedrooms and bathrooms."  What have you learned that you can go on?  Absolutely nothing.  This is why we list square footage and the amount of rooms.  How is a house like a TER reviewed provider?  Even if you do your research, you still get fucked in the end.  All I'm asking for is a bit more clarity on the thing I enjoy spending my money on the most.  

IsorokuYamamoto 265 reads
posted
8 / 16

I pretty much agree here

Posted By: JoeAverageHobbyist
 
 Most guys have no clue or else don't want to offend.  They end up categorizing a woman who is Heavy or a small BBW as Athletic, or one who is Average as Thin or Athletic.  Maybe TER needs to provide pictures as examples similar to what you did.  We'd still get it wrong though.

RussianWithLove 329 reads
posted
9 / 16

is for TER to hire that guy who takes all their pictures.  Have him bring some measuring tape and size them out for us.

RussianWithLove 241 reads
posted
10 / 16

Yes.  If there are clear recent photos then all this bullshit goes away.  It doesn't even have to show the face.  Let that be a surprise.  Who cares.  Just let us see the body clearly, unshopped.  The problem is a large portion of this industry depends on deception to profit.  They bank on the fact that 80% of the time, the guy will go through with it anyways.  Add in "bribes" like extended sessions, bbfs, etc.. and you can get those 80% to say you look like a supermodel.   It leaves the rest of us discussing everything through PMs trying to figure out wtf is what.

AnastasiaKane See my TER Reviews 232 reads
posted
11 / 16

Just like everything else on TER. I'm categorized as "Average" which is fine, I don't believe that word alone has ever deterred anyone from seeing me. I typically classify myself as "Athletic" because I pole dance as a sport and on top of that work with a personal trainer three times a week. Perhaps the gentleman who initially set up my profile thought "Average" meant, average for a provider? I mean, who really knows?

So I think as long as the reviews say the photos and the real life person match up, then the word doesn't make much difference.

MissErinBlack See my TER Reviews 296 reads
posted
12 / 16

I understand that some ladies do business like that, but I honestly feel like that's just shooting yourself in the foot.  While my professional images are photoshopped to remove things like stray hairs and lint, and perhaps to enhance color, one thing I insist upon is that my photos are accurate and representative of me. why deceive someone who is actually going to see you? It doesn't make a lot of sense if you're trying to build a clientele that consists of repeat business.    

I think there's a lot to be said for selfies too, although selfies can be photoshopped as well

magg 17 Reviews 274 reads
posted
14 / 16

Amen Erin, Get the pictures right, not just the glamour shots that could even make me look attractive.. (btw , your pics are very nice.)

MissErinBlack See my TER Reviews 308 reads
posted
15 / 16

Different women are hwp depending on their body types, and being "hwp curvy" doesn't mean a whole lot without knowing a providers actual weight, actual height, and actual measurements.  Not to mention, weight and height don't necessarily tell you much about someone's build.  

I understand what you're getting at.  You're curvy, as in hip to waist to chest ratio, not "curvy" as a euphemism for being a larger woman.  I actually hate that terminology used to describe large women (myself included), because I'm not curvy.  Sure, I have really big tits, but my waist and my hips aren't much different when it comes to measurement.

This is why accurate photo representation is important, and why these categories aren't.  Categories are subjective, whereas accurate photos show what someone's got, and it's up to the other person to decide it that's what they want.

reddyfreddy1966 252 reads
posted
16 / 16

Petite should be for ladies like 5'2" and shorter with minimal body fat.

Register Now!