The review process is inherently subjective. In evaluating a review I have to read the details. I've seen reviews where a '6' is given and if I received that kind of service I would give it an '8' or '9' as well as the reverse. It comes with the territory and no amount of whining will change it. No one should rely on just the number to evaluate the quality of the prostitute's service.
Trying to consistently standardize down to a number the quality of a sexual encounter when we all have subjective views of what we want is a fool's errand. I decide on the number to give on performance as to how I feel when the session is over and how emotionally and physically satisfied I am. It can't get more subjective than that.
To your original whine, eh I mean complaint, its hard to say what was on the menu since the ad is no longer functioning but if she offered BBBJ, (I prefer them covered to mitigate the risk of disease transmission) DFK, anal, and DATY and the monger only did DFK she would be eligible to receive a 10 and it wouldn't be appropriate for TER to downgrade the review.
This argument will exist as long as TER insists on tying offered services to what we can rate for performance. Based on current rules you're right, this doesn't get a 10. But that's moot because there's already categories for each service a girl can offer and whether she offers it. Tying it to the rating is useless for us.
Perfect example: We know a non-FS FBSM can only get a max 7 rating, so how are we supposed to differentiate a mediocre FBSM from a truly outstanding FBSM? Both could get a 7, cuz hey I get a HJ from a naked hottie and yeah, it's a hot time. But a session that includes much more than the norm, and leaves you thinking "wow, now that's how you do a massage" also gets a 7.
TER needs to understand what we're looking for and make the performance rating completely subjective at the discretion of the reviewer.
Sorry for the soapbox speech guys, this one's been bugging me.
That monger seemed very happy with the service he received. To him it seemed a 10, since the prostitute is no longer working we don't see the ad. Maybe greek etc was on the menu which would have made it eligible for a 10.
The review process is inherently subjective. In evaluating a review I have to read the details. I've seen reviews where a '6' is given and if I received that kind of service I would give it an '8' or '9' as well as the reverse. It comes with the territory and no amount of whining will change it. No one should rely on just the number to evaluate the quality of the prostitute's service.
Trying to consistently standardize down to a number the quality of a sexual encounter when we all have subjective views of what we want is a fool's errand. I decide on the number to give on performance as to how I feel when the session is over and how emotionally and physically satisfied I am. It can't get more subjective than that.
To your original whine, eh I mean complaint, its hard to say what was on the menu since the ad is no longer functioning but if she offered BBBJ, (I prefer them covered to mitigate the risk of disease transmission) DFK, anal, and DATY and the monger only did DFK she would be eligible to receive a 10 and it wouldn't be appropriate for TER to downgrade the review.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
