Does anyone else get irritated by the overuse of the term "One in a lifetime"??  I have noted several reviewers the past few months that have hobby histories that are sprinkled with this term repeatedly. That has to annoy providers as well as hobbyists. I feel that you can use that term in regard to "appearance" more than once, however I believe each reviewer should be careful to use it just ONCE for "performance". Maybe I haven't been drinking enough beer and shouldn't let this get to me.

What do you do if a lady comes along with whom you click even better and does even better?

Personally I give her a "9" and explain in the review that she is top quality.  But that's just me.

We need a #11 that can only be given once per hobbyist, but re-assigned whenever someone better comes along or the #11 falls out of favor with her reviewer.  So TER would have to have a way of tracking.  But a Spinal Tap #11 elimates the needs to backup every 10 to a 9.

LOL...well maybe we at least need an asterisk next to the BEST "10" so it is the only "10" that is included in a search.  I search a lot using the number for performance and it makes sense to limit the liberal use of the number. JMO

An easier solution may be to include a mandatory 4-choice field for every review:

1. My wife hasn't fucked my fat ass in 2 years and everything is once in a lifetime.
2. I get regular sex from my SO but not as often as I want/need.
3. I get regular sex from my SO but it is lame.
4. I am a pervert or deviant and chase every manner of pussy.

How do you rank the value of each persons review? I think motivation is a big factor and if you do your homework (read reviews) it is easy to value and average the lot.

I think it all comes out in the wash. And I do not yearn for faster or smarter searches.

Compared to other cities Chicago needs more reviews. TER reviews to date by city: NY 2,148; LA 1,270; DC 889; MIA 785; CHI 778; BOS 652; LV 518.

More reviews are much more useful than better searches. To me. The quantity of Chicago TER reviews does not reflect the quality of our market. And we need more people contibuting, myself included.