however, for the sake of the newcomers on here, it is worth bringing up again.  The other day, we had a review go up for Angel where the guy scored her a 5 for looks and a 4 for performance...

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=139616

The question to the board would be.... "How much weight do you put on a review like this when the lady obviously has almost 40 reviews that are contrary to it"?

We are not trying to get this review removed because it is our firm belief that we have to take the good with the bad.  We are also not complaining about this guys review because we feel that a person should feel comfortable expressing themselves in the reviews.... good or bad!

Just looking for your thoughts!

Tom

PS...having said all that, I am flabbergasted that anyone could score Angel a 5 for looks!  LOL!

I don't really put much into it. If it was coming from an established gent in the hobby, then there would be more credibilty. Like you said, the lady has 40 reviews and one bad one, shouldn't put that big of a blemish on her profile.

I'll be honest, as a fellow hobbyist, obviously reading low scored reviews like this, aren't what you want to read when you're considering dishing out $$$ on a lady. Truth be told, this is the guys first review posted, so how much can we buy into it? I would bet that Angel reflects all of her stellar reviews and not this curveball thrown at her.

~~~~Blaze81

I read the review and it seemed like the reviewer had a different expectation than what actually transpired.  I also thought that this was the reviewers first review so many would take that into consideration not seeing a "history" of how he views the gals.

Frankly, this is a good review to see amongst a sea of reviews (for Angel).  It gives a prospect a reason to read more than one, and hopefully the prospect will take into account that YMMV and what a gals physical characteristics and how that may appeal to him.

When I see something like this, I believe that the john didn't do his homework, had a different type of gal in mind, had a type of session in mind, and then the gal wasn't his ideal...but in many instances that is on the guy.  And then you see a review like this, as well as many others we have seen like this over time.

What I find more disturbing is that you would even mention that you "would not try and have this removed".  Why would this be something that should be removed (or even considered)?  Was there something in there that wasn't the john's interpretation of the session?  That is a major issue amongst the TER readers, is how often does a "mediocre" review get pulled...and only because it may hurt the gals rating

truthfully it is sometimes hard to distinguish what appointment wrote which review especially since about 1 in 20 actually writes a review!  Just did mot want to give the impression that we were trying to get a bad review removed!

We had this discussion a few weeks ago (as you suggested in your OP) and of course, no resolution to the topic.  And there never will be one.  But bringing this up again (for the newer members as you point out) will allow many "lurkers" to read the review..check out your site...and perhaps they may have an interest in seeking out the gals on your site.

Whether a gal receives a 5 in appearance (plain) or a 10 (model) is always going to be "in the eye of the beholder".  And as the discussions on just how a guy doesn't see a gal the same way "everybody" else does is always the slam on the guy "must be blind".  But the reality is that many of the ladies have appearance scores that are consistently "inflated", and that is the way that TER scoring is based.

I have seen several gals from your agency and have always felt that these ladies were delivered as advertised.  But I did my homework, saw the gal that physically worked for me, and the session type I wanted.  Hence, no disappointments.  But not everyone approaches this the same way, and the results can be the "disappointed guy who expected something else".

This seems pretty much like a one off review and experience.  As this is his first review, it's hard to put too much weight and value in it.  Additionally, it seems that with this being his first time that maybe his expectations were off or unclear.

It does sound like Angel was also having an off day.

So overall, I would read more than his review and make my own decision.

well I don't know where this guy is coming from giving her a 5! performance score, well I wasn't there, but look at her pictures. No way she is a 5!!

My first provider experience, back in 2002, was definitely not what I had envisioned in my head. It's fairly rare to find the same passion and raw energy in a provider experience than from a normal early stages civi experience. I never wrote a review for her and never will (she's long gone from Chicago now). It would not have been fair to her.

On the other had, it did sound like Angel was not the right girl for him to be with. If I was a newbie I'd take this into account. I'm not, so I would be banging her as hard as I could in a heartbeat =)

As an old guy of 70 recently into the hobby I can understand what happened here.  This guy has no insight into himself.  Now I don't mean this negatively nor do I mean it to knock the guy.  I mean to say the guy probably doesn't know what kind of woman appeals to him physically - small, large, tall, short, soft tits, tight tits, A-cup, F-cup, the whole package.  This is ignoring the rest of the package, or even the chance that Angel might have been having an off day.  Not to mention that this guy doesn't realize that a deep throat provider
who swallows is a rare find.  
Maybe he needs a bit of advice.  I remember my first time was with a mature woman (must have been in her 40's) and I just banged away and she was nice enough to just endure it.  She didn't kiss either.  That was in 1966.  
I wrote it all up for my girl friend.  

Anyhow, I would leave it up as a curiosity.  It just shows what attitude could do.  Besides, it does show that Angel is a 10 when it comes to BBBJ.

good point, need accurate review, so can decide, hey she does this good, doesnt do this well, everyone has certain turn ons they are looking for in their own private experience, thats why we venture out into the 'hobby'