Make sure you check her site out carefully (and peruse the reviews carefully) as she has a notation on there that she prefers guys NOT in the retirement age category.
Obviously retirement age can vary significantly (and she doesn't define this)...but just be forewarned that if you are an "older" gent (heck..I know guys who retired at 35..but I doubt she is thinking along those lines), she may have restrictions.
Otherwise, she looks good 
sure how to take this one, is it trash talk, or maybe she didnt want to see you.But hey she can be the honey in my tea anytime
I have no axe to grind with this gal...as I have never seen her...nor attempted to.
But her site is quite clear on her "age issues"...and those are HER words, NOT mine!
And the guy who reviewed her in Jan 2011 was quite specific in this being an issue for HIM.
If you are so "hot to trot" on this gal, suggest to her that she change the wording on her site so that those of us who might be "retirement age" know what her definition of that is so none of us need waste any of our valuable time on this gal. I am sure she is quite hot...but for whom?
Frankly, I have not seen another provider put an age limit on their site on the upper end...but only on minimum ages.
In my experience, providers tend to happily accommodate older clients. It sounds like it's often better money and less physically exhausting work... to each their own.
Agree that communication on this is important. If there are limitations on who she'll see, spell it out and don't be vague about it. If you're turned off by men old enough to be your father, that's your call. It's probably a bad business decision, but life is not only about business.
Though, personally, I won't see a provider who outwardly advertises herself as having biases - they tend not to be people I enjoy being in the company of. If a woman states she'll only see white men (which I am), that's a real turn-off even if it doesn't eliminate me as a possibility for her, it will eliminate her as a possibility for me - I don't need to waste my time with someone who is racially intolerant.
Providers don't get a say in who they have sex with? Do you get a say in who you have sex with? Would you have sex with someone you're not physically attracted to? So because providers are in the business of offering sex, they must do fat guys and old guys and guys they find disgusting and guys who smell and guys they have absolutely no physical attraction to, right? Wrong, providers get to choose who they'll be intimate with and anyone who holds a provider's racial, body-type, age, or any other preferences against her should look in the mirror. We discriminate in every provider we choose and they do the same.
Go ahead and feel free to not see providers who clearly state their preferences for sex partners. But don't insinuate that these providers are evil in some way because they're not attracted to every type of male on the planet. There's nothing politically correct about sex or who we find attractive or who we wouldn't touch with a 10-foot pole. Sorry to burst your bubble, but this isn't some large corporation with non-discrimination mandates. All humans have sexual preferences and believe it or not, providers are human. Even more enlightening is that women in this business actually have sexual preferences and some choose to play only within their preferences. Who woulda thunk?
the fact based on the reviews that she will gladly accept a guy's (who is not the client she wants to see based on a website posting) donation...and not delivering the type of service as other reviews (and the reviewer was expecting) had outlined.
Many gals have ethnic limits (which they will post on their ads or sites). The only time this would be deceptive is if they saw that guy, took the donation, and didn't perfom as they otherwise might have. All the ladies are free (they're not slaves last time I checked) to see whomever and whenver they want, as well as command whatever dollars they seek for their time.
Where it becomes an issue is when a gal deceptively sees a guy who clearly (based on their own definitions) is not a guy they want to see, takes his donation, and does not perform. That is the only issue here...nothing more. As I suggested to an earlier poster (or to the gal herself), post your age limitations so that it is clearly understood and no guys over that age will waste one second in attempting to contact her!
You're right, she doesn't list a specific age but I don't see anything deceptive by her inferring she doesn't want to see men in their mid-60's which to most people is retirement age. Also, every session is YMMV, we all know it, and there's nothing we can do about it. Not everyone clicks and if she decides to see an older guy and doesn't perform. oh well. Just because a provider takes your donation doesn't mean she'll give you the same rock-star performance other guys have gotten. Obviously she's not attracted to older men so if you're of retirement age and you still ask to see her, common sense dictates that it might not be the best session. Read the reviews and if she's under-performing with other older guys, don't see her.
Reviews do us a disservice in a way because they lead us to expect that our session will rock like those other sessions we read about. Maybe, maybe not, YMMV is the rule. The way I read her preferences, I'd pass on her because I'm obviously not in her target age range.
Setting a hard age limit isn't really fair to her because she'd eliminate some clients she might indeed find attractive. 65 is a number, some guys look 50 at 65 and others look 80. She might be fine with a guy who looks 50 and is in shape so why automatically eliminate him from consideration just because of a number? The way she states it gives her wiggle room to make exceptions and that's her business decision and not one we get to judge. Judge her only by her performance, not by her stated preferences. If she's consistently giving lousy service to some guys, fine, call her out.
So, if you have not seen her, and you are not trying to see her or intending to see her, then what...bored? Why is it your business? Unless she ASKED you to say something on this board, why?
It is not your place, it is unnecessary...no one seems to have appreciated it as valuable info and it takes up room on a board that we are only allowed to post on once a week...would be nice if my post didn't scroll off the page before i am out of town...impossible with unjustified, and unnecessary posts like this.
I hope that girl doesn't mind you messing with her business. Even if she does have it on her site, she may choose at her own discretion, based on a pic, for instance - to see an older gent...now that gent might not even bother because you made it sound as if she was going to vomit on them when she saw them when all she is doing is trying to get herself better looking men.
Maybe this is only playtime for you, but for us, this is an income, a complicated lifestyle and an extremely edgy business...we don't need this kind of help.
One of the PRIMARY reasons girls choose this is because they can have complete autonomy of what they want to do...we can advertise ANYWAY we want, and see or not see WHOMEVER we want.
If she only wants younger guys let her...she will find out soon enough that the better money and better sex is with the older gents, or maybe she does awesome with younger guys and sees no reason to see someone that is not her type, i don't know the girl, so i can't say...but i do know i will defend her right to do it HOWEVER she wants.
When a gal is misleading what she is offering and to whom is a rather large issue. If this gal only wants to see guys under a stated age..well, state the damn age. I see many gals who will post a "minimum" age, and that is clear in what it means (and they ALWAYS state the age). What this gal is doing is vague, at best, and when she did (does) see a guy she doesn't care for due to her limitations, the session suffers. That is not acceptable in this world. However, if she can sneak this through, grab some additional unearned cash, and hope the disgruntled client doesn't know about TER...well not a bad way to make a living.
I have seen quite a few gals thus far, and have never encountered anyone who is being this deceptive. I have absolutely NO qualms if you, her or another other gal wants to post her limitations, just do so in obvious and bold faced so there are NO misunderstandings. And for God's sake, should your screening NOT catch the guy before he shows up, I trust that a reputable provider would tell him that he isn't "up to snuff" and send him on his way...and NOT accept a donation under false pretenses!
So feel free to defend her right to advertise and promote herself to your hearts content. It is gal's like this that give the "hard working..really honest" gals a BAD name!
You show up at the door with cold hard cash. She looks you over and you're not her type and she'd really rather not see you but, well, she's a hooker and you have money so you get sex! Unless you stink to high heaven and won't shower or you're 500 lbs of blubber or abusive, I highly doubt any provider will throw you out because you don't meet all of her specs, LOL.
Money speaks...and some providers will take you stinky, blubber, and all because...you have money.
No one was asking about her, and to be honest I had never heard of her until YOU brought her up. For you to be posting this out of the blue seems a little suspicious to me.
And since the Chicago board is for those of us guys who are interested in seeing gals (including those that travel), I had thought that those guys who did NOT fit this gals profile might want to make sure they do their homework. We read all too often about disappointments, and from the gist of this gals website..solidified by her reviews, she clearly has a "type of client" she wishes to NOT see.
Perhaps if she was more clear on who her target market was I wouldn't have raised this issue..but since I had not yet seen anything remotely close to this on any other providers website, I thought it might be prudent to openly discuss this on this board.
If this is of no interest to you, you are more than welcome to skip this post. But as many of the TER brethren here would not fit her "client", I felt that it was more than justified to notify those who might have had an interest in her to carefully read her "requirements...and they are voluminous".
And I had never heard of her till today as well. But now I know who she is and is certainly not someone I have any interest in ever seeing. Each gal is free to decide on who she would like to see, but to see someone (per her review that depicted this problem) that she clearly didn't find in her target and not provide (but gladly accepted the donation) the stated services, that is just someone I will avoid.
There are too many gals locally (and traveling) that are available and don't have this restricition. While this gal is obviously free to select whomever, we are also free to know details that may (and did) create a poor session! And if being called out on HER own website criteria and postings is screwing with her business...well sorry about that (not really!). But last time I checked I was paying the bill, and I expect an upfront and honest provider to meet with.
Just my .02
There are numerous providers who screen out potential clients by listing restrictions on their sites and they are being VERY upfront and honest by doing so. There's a good reason for them to post this information publicly - to keep the number of inquiries manageable.
This topic has come up before and CPA, I have to disagree with you about calling out a provider who lists client preferences on her site. Yes, we're allowed to post above a provider's ad but discretion about what we call out is important. If the provider is dangerous, a drug user, a ROB, call her out. But don't call out providers for posting sexual preferences regardless of what their real reasons may be. Every woman has a right to decline clients and just because she lists her preferences publicly doesn't make her evil or racially intolerant. Maybe she doesn't like bald guys or 350 lb guys, so what? If she asks not to be contacted by those types, is she a bad person? No. You may not like her choices but they're HER choices to make. This is sex and everything about sex is discriminatory. All of us get to choose who we want to see and we don't have to give no stinkin' reasons why we make those choices.
Many providers have restrictions, and they are still excellent providers and nice people too. In fact, I had trouble accessing Yuri's site and let her know and she was super sweet and helpful. I would see her in a heartbeat if our schedules lined up, and I'm sure they will someday. Besides...she looks hotter than hell to me.
They get paid for their time only...remember?
And seriously, do you honestly think a gal will care if you are hard? For their pleasure? Really?
I think what PP said earlier is closer to correct...and the reason for my PSA.
She will take the guys $$$ and simply NOT deliver if he doesn't fit her profile. And my only issue is that she at least be "honest" in who she really doesn't want to see. Not some vague description that, as PP suggested could be anyone.
But I'd like to see another provider's site that has this type of limitation (that is so undescript) on there in any form. Feel free to PM with that site so I can be enlightened.
As a senior, I appreciate knowing. We had a popular gal here in SWFLA suddenly announce in her ads that she didn't want anyone over 50, I believe it was. Yes, she gave an age cutoff. Other providers specifically advertise for us old guys because there are so many of us.
Btw, I couldn't see a way to get past page one of the lady you're talking about. Maybe you put the heat on.
But truthfully it would have been better to have defined the age restriction rather than eliminate that verbage altogether. But I suspect that once she leaves Chicago that language may go back up.
I guess I should retract my accusation of her being deceptive...but probably not as she didn't change this up without some coercion (and perhaps a flood of web hits).
But I would still be cautious for anyone "retirement minded", she doesn't want to see you.
Sorry PP but I'm not retirement age or ED challenged, but I stand by my assertions that the gals who "honestly" portray themselves to the community tend to be well rewarded with our time and more importantly, our dollars.
the harder he is, the less work she has to do. Keeping older guys hard long enough to get to the finish line can be a LOT of work, right ladies?
Why can't we all just get along? Sheesh.
I agree with the concept, but don't go hijacking my alias.
Seems some have forgotten... the Ladies set the rules...
I see no reason to single out this item of preference. In fact, all this item should do is cause one to reach out and ask for clarification.
*full disclosure*
Yes, I have met Yuri