Chicago

It's not rocket science
XER1 3 Reviews 512 reads
posted
1 / 4

I have a few reviews that have not made it.
Mostly for lack of detail.
I am not good describing details and writing in general.
I prefer numbers like Appearance (1-10)  Performance(1-10)
and all the check boxes but not good with details specially if it isn't a positive review.
But even the good ones I can just tell you whether I enjoyed myself or not and whether I thought it was worthwhile.

RespectfullyYours 9 Reviews 296 reads
posted
2 / 4

There are a lot of bare-bones interviews out there that have passed the grade. I'm assuming you know what went on during your session. Just use the acronym system, and you should be fine. Don't get hung up on syntax or grammar, there are no Pulitzer's being awarded here. For example:

We hugged and began LFK that turned into DFK.
She dropped to her knees and began a great BBBJ
I pulled her onto the bed and we began 69
I asked for the cover and we began in mish, then took turns doing CG, RCG before finishing in K9 where I lost my first cup.

It's pretty impersonal, and I don't think a lot of providers appreciate this type of writing, but it appears to pass muster. if you can through in a complimentary adjective or adverb once in a while that would be fine

Eangold 3 Reviews 307 reads
posted
3 / 4

I'm sort of the opposite. The reviews are too much of a pain in the ass so I don't bother. I know that pisses people off, but whatever, I pay my $30/month, I can use the service however I want. Plus I only see well reviewed girls anyway, if I ever saw a girl with no reviews, or a long break between reviews, I would take the time to do it.

As for the reviews, you shouldn't have to go through that huge list of drop down boxes and entering URLs unless you want to, I have no time for that. Why can't I just write a paragraph and click submit when a girl already has all that information listed

seeker000 24 Reviews 231 reads
posted
4 / 4

I think most people would agree that is how the system should work.  The first reviewer enters all the information.   Subsequent reviewers should then be able to enter the TER ID for the provider and all that information is auto-magically filled in.  If you want to change any of it you have the option.  Otherwise you fill in a few fields (ratings, session specific services), write the description and submit.  For some reason the powers that be at TER just refuse to simplify things to that point.  Must be the "we're making money so why bother expending the effort" philosophy.  The last time I wrote a review I was asked to enter the provider's TER ID at the top of the form and was expecting everything to get filled in for me.  But alas, that did not happen.  It just ended up being one more field to fill in.

Register Now!