Mike, I stand by Angels performance as a 9... I only award a 10 for perfornamnce if she bows to my member as if it is a shrine...lol. She is hot and not only CIM but swallowed...

CIM...."Swallows" should qualify alone for a 10.  LOL!

Per the rules [see below]. A lady does not necessarily have to offer or participate in Greek to be eligible for a 10 [as long as the other services are offered].  

An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum.



http://www.theeroticreview.com/info_policies/reviewFAQ.asp#B

I don't pay much attention to the scores either.  There's too many "once in a lifetime" ratings to be credible.  The text is what matters.

what a lady has to do, to earn a 9 or 10 for performance these days!?  I mean, it used to be that if the lady provided dfk, cim and a great attitude, that was enough.  Below is a link to a review that came up yesterday for Angel.  I normally dont read all the reviews of the ladies but a client bought this to my attention.  I don't know if the reviewer or a person at TER gave this two 7's but I do know that somebody did and after reading it I don't understand why.

Is there a new standard that a lady must meet to score a higher mark?  Maybe they have to spin three times on their head or something.....I don't know!

Just to be clear, I am not trying to get this score changed.  If a lady hangs out here long enough, they are going to score a few sub norm reviews and 7's are not exactly horrible!  The only questions I am asking here, for VIP members who are able to read this review........ "Does the score match the review to you"?.... and if not.... "What could she have done differently, to score higher"?  ........ "Just wondering"?

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1053220

If I wrote a areview like that the score would be higher, 8 or 9. Throw in some dirty talk and it gets to 10.
Looks like this is the guy's first review? Might have something to do with it. How though, I'm not sure.

For the record, an appearence score cannot be changed by TER.  The performance score can only be lowered if certain criteria are not met (DFK, BBBJ, anal).  In the case of Angel's review, she is only eligible for a max score of 9.  Without talking to the reviewer, we don't know if that was his given score or whether TER lowered it.  After reading the review, I probably would have scored the experience as an 8.  But to really know I would have to be there.

The review SOUNDS and is written like the performance merited an 8 or 9, maybe that was what the reviewer thought a 7 was.

only "eligible" for a "max" score of 9?

That's why I don't just go by the scores but have to read the text of the reviews.  Some people give these inflated scores but then others give lower scores even though it sounded like they had the time of their life!  Over time, it all shakes out, but you can't just go with one review.

My humble thought would be that maybe that since this is the reviewer's first review he doesn't have anything to base Angel's performance on.  Sort of like those competitions were the first competitor is almost penalized by being first because the judges have to leave room for those who come after.

A provider must participate in "greek" to get a perfect 10, at least that is what I have been told.

certain things must be on the menu to be eligible

From the review guidelines

#7  In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum.

This does not mean she earns extra points for offering the service(s); just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is performed during your session with her. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she offers, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score.

If your review rates a provider higher than her maximum score, the score will be adjusted down to her maximum.

Unfortunately cim doesn't qualify


-- Modified on 12/22/2010 12:12:00 PM

That is why he is King of the Chicago Board!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

From what I read, she should great higher than a 7.  TER may have lowered the preformance for some wierd reason.  I've seen Angel, and she was great!

it looked a lot like that. I had no context, not having seen other scores. Once I saw how others scored in their reviews, I went back and redid the review (by then the first two reviews) with significantly higher scores. It took a couple of tries to get the revised reviews approved, but it was the right thing to do.

I did notice this review for some reason, and noted how positive it was with what, in the context of how scores are given here, are fairly low scores. But I also agree that the scores are meaningless, both because everyone has their own scale, and because some providers and hobbyists work the scores for their own purposes.

End of the day, Mike, I would not sweat it too much. Obviously, Angel is good.

Zig

you can achieve CIM without it being a BBBJ?  This whole thing has gotten way to technical and picky.

bbbj is mentioned, I doubt the review was lowered.  Most of the girls are all to willing to bring another lady or at least kiss 9,10.  Bad review, without a doubt, lowered ?.

I would agree that the scores are likely due to this being his first posted review and not having the basis for consideration.  Like others have said, I wouldn't place to much emphasis on the number as it's usually the review text that sells.

Swallowing, hell I'm ready to set the wedding date.

The review clearly states BBBJ. I don't have a clue as to whether the reviewer gave the 7 on performance or it was changed.

I think jiz goes down smoother than ice cream and in the words of Sojourner7 "It's the suction that counts..."

Tee-hee

XXX-Giselle

Well, it's been nearly three years since I've hobbied (though I'm still looking for the just the right provider to jump back in with for an upcoming birthday), and I've never written a review (sorry), but if I did, numbers would be based on the following:

1) appearance
2) multiple cups
3) conversation between cups

The rest, to me, is window dressing. I suppose speaking Greek might bump a score up, but the provider most fluent in that language whom I've ever met is Bunny Bleu, and I wouldn't have given her more than a 7. Tens in my book would be reserved for PJ Sparxx, Tracey Adams and a local girl with whom I was a regular many years ago in Denver. All gorgeous, all good for multiple cups, all fun and/or interesting to talk to between cups. And none spoke Greek or spun on her head!

I think "see through" is much more appropriate!

Posted By: giselle69

I think jiz goes down smoother than ice cream and in the words of Sojourner7 "It's the suction that counts..."

Tee-hee

XXX-Giselle

It makes me so warm and fuzzy inside to know that I recommend you to my clients if I'm too busy and you slam me like this.  SWEEEEEEET.  Jeez grow a heart Grinch

Happy Holidays Jerkface!

XXX-Giselle

a 10 is a 9 that swallows. Of course not officially speaking just my opinion.

-- Modified on 12/26/2010 1:56:51 PM

To me it sounded like he had a good time so 8 wouldve been suffice.  For me a 7 is a good time, an 8 is a good time to the point where I feel like we have a connection (real or fake). 9 there's gotta be something about the girl outside of the service that I really like, I mean she's gotta have me to where I can't walk out the room properly.  I never hope I see a 10, because I cannot afford to see a woman like that once a week.

For the record I think the only 9 I have ever given was to Geanna.  Whenever I can afford to have a good time I go to your site (MTA) to see if she's working before I go any where else.