Neither looks nor performance score is critical. The #s help me to exclude extremely low performers and to identify the "high end" (who are usually very expensive). Otherwise the #s just confirm that a provider is in the "solid middle".
An outlier of 6 in otherwise 8/9 is not concerning. A score of 2 or 3 might be depending on what happened.
BJ performance only matters as a piece of the larger experience. Is she mechanical and giving off the vibe that she wants you to finish and leave quickly? Then the cover matters a lot - it's a sign of being a provider but not a GFE (emotional). If she seems passionate and interested in you, then the cover can be okay with me.
Hair color is unimportant.
Prefer W or SW suburbs.
Here are a few questions to answer and give the Ladies around here something to ponder about what you are looking for....
When looking at reviews in the data base, what is more important to you.... the looks or the performance score? In other words, if a lady scores consistent 9's & 10's in the looks category but averages 5 or 6 in performance and another lady averages 5 or 6 in looks but scores 9's & 10's in performance, which one would you go see?
Also, does the the way the lady performs a bj.... ie: covered, bbbj, cim or swallows, matter to you at all?
Also, if a lady recently scores a sub par review like a 5 or 6 for performance from a known reviewer, when she normally scores 8 or higher and has many pages of reviews, does this sway your decision at all.
Finally, do you prefer blonds, brunettes or redheads and what area do you prefer.... the city or n, nw, w, sw suburbs?
Perfomance over looks.
BJ style very important.
Potentially swayed by known reviewer. Everyone has an off day though.
Sucker for bleach blond.
Northern suburbs.
What is more important...looks or performance?
Honestly the scores themselves mean very little as they are all subjective. I go more on the lady's pictures to judge looks and on the actual text in the reviews to get info on their performance. That said, I would rather have someone who is less attractive but rocks my world, than model beautiful who just lays there or has no connection. The good thing is that there are plenty of ladies who meet both.
Does the way she performs a BJ matter?
For me...yes. I don't enjoy covered BJs so BBBJ is a key, as for CIM or swallows...those are added perks.
Does an out of line score make a difference?
Depends on many things... Who was the reviewer, how do they write/score reviews, does this really seem like a "one time" occurrence or a trend. It is pretty clear most of the time whether it was an off day, or there was a lack of chemistry.
What and where do I prefer?
Yes to the women...they are all beautiful. Personally I prefer the western suburbs and I'Hare. Getting downtown can be hard.
I value performance more than looks. I don't worry about the scores as much as how the reviewer describes his appointment. If his recap indicates the provider has the attitude I like, then I get interested.
I am more interested in BBBJ, and am less interested in those that don't offer that.
I look at reviews that stand out from others, but unless there are many more negative reviews, an occasional exception won't sway me.
Brunettes catch my eye more.
North suburbs, please!!!
Hey, in case you are around...just wanted to say hi. Long time no see/talk!
I hope you are doing well. Sorry but I don't have your email any more, and I'm only a basic member here so I am not entitled to use the email system here.
I don't know if email addys post automatically or not... I'm still at [email protected].
Have a great day!
The numbers are so subjective as to be almost worthless, the text is the key. Anyone who has to use a cover for a bj is a non-starter for me, as is someone who doesn't allow daty. And performance is always more important than looks.........
IMHO, performance is, but both enter into the decision process. When a lady's ratings are 7s or above, I read the oddball reviews; the 6s when a lady generally has 8s and 9s. Very often I've foundverbal descriptions that seem to indicate the reviewer is just a low scorer. Judging by the narative, she may deserve an 8 or 9.
I can generally evaluate looks better from the lady's gallery than from a rating. As long as the ratings are generally favorable, I'll look there. If I notice pics with her tummy concealed behind a leg or a piece of furniture, I'll go back and read the reviews, especially the lower rated ones.
If the lady has reviews from posters I am familiar with, I give them more credibility than those from "strangers."
When looking at reviews in the data base, what is more important to you.... the looks or the performance score? In other words, if a lady scores consistent 9's & 10's in the looks category but averages 5 or 6 in performance and another lady averages 5 or 6 in looks but scores 9's & 10's in performance, which one would you go see?
Also, does the the way the lady performs a bj.... ie: covered, bbbj, cim or swallows, matter to you at all?
Also, if a lady recently scores a sub par review like a 5 or 6 for performance from a known reviewer, when she normally scores 8 or higher and has many pages of reviews, does this sway your decision at all.
Finally, do you prefer blonds, brunettes or redheads and what area do you prefer.... the city or n, nw, w, sw suburbs?
And yes, I hobby particularly for very specific things, so how an activity is performed/or not performed is important to me. Attraction is in the eye of the beholder, so blond, brunette, or redhead is cool, though for me, I do love red/auburn hair. Where a lady is located depends on the time of day. I will do the northwest burbs before 2pm simply because I hate rush hour traffic in those areas as I make my way to the city. City can be ok, but parking costs are getting close to what providers want for their time. Wish there were more folks SW and NWI.
Performance score over looks score.
BBBJ is preferred and something that I always look for when selecting a lady. CIM is nice but not a deal breaker since I'm mostly a one shot guy and usually end up finishing in the hat.
One bad or sub par review doesn't affect my decision much. I usually read the review with the lowest score first and use that as my low watermark for what to expect. I use the juicy details to discern whether it's a YMMV outlier situation or whether the hobbyist is just a tough grader when it comes to the scores but the encounter was still satisfactory. Who the reviewer is, how many reviews they have written, how long they've been actively hobbying and who they've reviewed are things I consider when judging the validity of a review.
I find myself selecting more dark haired and red haired women, but then blondes are good too. 
Mainly NW burbs, but can do W burbs as well. No city for me.
[1] The lady must score at least an 8 in both categories.
[2] I will see a lady who only offers CBJ , but only if she is GFE in every other way.
[3] I rarely , if ever, see ladies that do not kiss.
[4] If a lady has a string of great reviews but one pops up that is less than stellar I will check the reviews history and comments about the lady. Some guys tend to score lower by nature. Often I'll see a 7 in appearrance and then reading the dudes review discover that he raves as to how beautiful she is. Go figure?
[5] Hair color is not an issue one way or another.
[6] When home I prefer incall....when I find myself in great cities like Chicago I insist on outcall. All in all I tend to prefer outcall appts . I love the antcipation of the soft knock on my door as I wait in my candle lit room or drifting down to the bar to meet the beautiful lady comming to see me [ I'll never forget the drooling dudes who observed me meet Dodda Venette in my trendy hotel bar for a glass of wine before we slipped upstairs..lol]
[7] Looks really can not make up for bad performance. However, great interaction can overcome a less than drop dead gorgeous babe.
I guess that is more than 2 cents worth, but don't worry...no extra charge !
When looking at reviews in the data base, what is more important to you.... the looks or the performance score? In other words, if a lady scores consistent 9's & 10's in the looks category but averages 5 or 6 in performance and another lady averages 5 or 6 in looks but scores 9's & 10's in performance, which one would you go see?
As for locations, anywhere but downtown Chicago where parking and parking prices are ridiculous!
* performance over looks.
* bbbj preferred
* do not give much weight to reviews. Unless many unfavorable reviews.
I have had reviews declined due to not inline with others. Also if a frequent poster, I give
more credibility to review.
* Enjoy all hair colors but brunettes & redheads hold a special place.
* Prefer ohare and city, near north suburbs works.
When looking at reviews in the data base, what is more important to you.... the looks or the performance score? In other words, if a lady scores consistent 9's & 10's in the looks category but averages 5 or 6 in performance and another lady averages 5 or 6 in looks but scores 9's & 10's in performance, which one would you go see?
Also, does the the way the lady performs a bj.... ie: covered, bbbj, cim or swallows, matter to you at all?
Also, if a lady recently scores a sub par review like a 5 or 6 for performance from a known reviewer, when she normally scores 8 or higher and has many pages of reviews, does this sway your decision at all.
Finally, do you prefer blonds, brunettes or redheads and what area do you prefer.... the city or n, nw, w, sw suburbs?
I'll take performance over looks any day, although looks are important to some degree. Fortunately my likes tend to be a bit esoteric so the usual things people look for are things I don't really give a rats ass about.
bbbj is pretty much required for me, cim is nice but not a must have (I fully understand not wanting to do that). The rest is up in the air. In the past 15 years I've been able to orgasm while wearing a condom exactly twice, so while FS is enjoyable for me, I can't finish that way (no way I'm going BBFS and don't know any providers who would either).
If someone got a review that was a 5 or 6 from a reviewer where she usually received 8 or 9, I'd figure either they didn't have chemistry or she was having a bad day. If there were multiple reviews like that, or like a huge range of them, some 8s and some like 4 or 5, I'd start to wonder what was up...
I like blonders, brunettes AND redheads and prefer the city for convenience, but have been known to head out from time to time.
Performance over looks
BBBJ only! if a provider does CBJ, I won't see her
I might give a provider a pass on one low score but two low scores is a trend!
1. West suburbs 2. NW suburbs 3. O'Hare area - downtown can be a hassle!
Neither looks nor performance score is critical. The #s help me to exclude extremely low performers and to identify the "high end" (who are usually very expensive). Otherwise the #s just confirm that a provider is in the "solid middle".
An outlier of 6 in otherwise 8/9 is not concerning. A score of 2 or 3 might be depending on what happened.
BJ performance only matters as a piece of the larger experience. Is she mechanical and giving off the vibe that she wants you to finish and leave quickly? Then the cover matters a lot - it's a sign of being a provider but not a GFE (emotional). If she seems passionate and interested in you, then the cover can be okay with me.
Hair color is unimportant.
Prefer W or SW suburbs.
My dream date would be a redhead in the n or nw suburbs who does bbj and takes cim. And yes, the method of bj matters in my final decision (I'm not saying it's a deal-breaker, but it matters). In terms of scores, for appearance, I look at the pictures and make my own decision. The only way an appearance score would catch my eye would be if the pics were beautiful and the scores were consistently below five, leading me to believe there was a bait and switch or the provider's appearance has drastically changed. I do pay attention to the performance score, but in truth I put more faith in the narrative. Each hobbyist is looking for something different and while one guy might give her a 9 because she swore at him in Italian as he finished, I might give her a 4 because she left the tv on during the visit. It's all subjective. I actually like to see an occasional 5 or 6 among the high reviews, because then I can establish a range--what's the worst that can happen on this date and what's the best? Just my two cents.
1. Only look at 8 to 10s in both categories (Guess I'm a snob)
2. BJ... Doesn't matter to me which way the wind blows
3. One bad review means a bad day or a crappy hobbyist. Two or three... I stay away.
4. Could care less about hair color.
5. Could care less about location but won't go to a seedy motel.
i sure look much differently now for a partner than i did years ago. as i have aged, looks have become increasingly less important. It's the ability to generate a feeling of intimacy that is paramount. i will not see a women who does not dfk. i generally do not see a woman with implants. I find women of all looks, shapes and sizes equally attractive if they can convey a passion that is generally referred to as gfe. when i was much younger it was the finish that was the most important. as i got older it is definately the process and road getting there that is what it's all about.
When looking at reviews in the data base, what is more important to you.... the looks or the performance score? In other words, if a lady scores consistent 9's & 10's in the looks category but averages 5 or 6 in performance and another lady averages 5 or 6 in looks but scores 9's & 10's in performance, which one would you go see?
Also, does the the way the lady performs a bj.... ie: covered, bbbj, cim or swallows, matter to you at all?
Also, if a lady recently scores a sub par review like a 5 or 6 for performance from a known reviewer, when she normally scores 8 or higher and has many pages of reviews, does this sway your decision at all.
Finally, do you prefer blonds, brunettes or redheads and what area do you prefer.... the city or n, nw, w, sw suburbs?