I'm shocked TER hasn't delved deeper into the verification process.  The Whitelist is, well, too white, too vanilla.  The provider doesn't learn much about the hobbyist.  I think the provider should be able to counter-review (is that a word?) a hobbyist that reviewed them, if they remember the session.  This could be a reliable resource for verification, plus, there are two sides to every story, so it would be refreshing to hear the provider's side in a "she just laid there" or a "I should have left" review.  What do you think?

Whitelists are generated by providers, why would they need additional information?

Rest assured in the knowledge that we do not share experiences about hobbyists.  This would jeopardize any confidentiality.  We only share info on dangerous clients who, through their actions, have lost the right to confidentiality by posing a threat to the provider community.  Sessions are private between the lady and the gent and we have no desire to post reviews.


If you are a newcomer to posting on this board, perhaps you would be better served by adding constructive comments to posts by other gents or reading old posts to get a feel for how this board works.  Or better yet, posting more carefully thought out queries.  We welcome posts and new members to the community and board as long as they are not an attempt to get attention.  Otherwise you may only get negative attention.


-- Modified on 9/1/2011 12:21:33 PM

You're getting a reputation for making dumb suggestions. Two for two...

As you have a way of cutting to the chase.

I love how everyone is so sophisticated in here.  Its paying for pussy, no science to it.