Let's be honest up front - none of this stuff is all that important. On the other hand, everyone's issues are important to them!
I did a review of Rose Lee (of Cleveland) a week back and it got rejected as being not detailed/explicit enough. I was initially outraged! Of course, I think that whatever I write is deathless prose.
I thought I should complain to a Moderator (but didn't - even before I read the post below). I thought I should look for the place to lodge a protest (but didn't) With a little thought and contemplation, I recalled all the great information and support this Board has been and decided that, well, I would just rewrite the review and try to comply. I did and it was accepted. The rewrite took me all of 5 minutes probably.
I also noticed a thread below started by one of the Moderators (that they don't handle reviews) and noticed that some people seemed to have some issues and/or perspectives that were interesting and perhaps controversial.
I know this is going to sound like sucking up to the "powers that be" and/or the Moderators. As I thought about I guess I decided that I should take the approach (like I did with writing my review) that - the rules are the rules. Comply with the rules or move on. If you want to respectfully disagree with the rules - fine - but keep it respectful and start with the back channel. The Moderators probably spend a lot more time that we realize doing this stuff. We should probably take that into account more before we get too critical.
This is a great resource and I am a paying and contributing member. I still have to abide by the rules (even if I don't like them). At the end of the day - I am not in charge and if I don't like it I can go elsewhere.
Every once in a while I feel the need to write something. My intended "tone" is just conversational (not confrontational).
There are so many great ladies I need to make time for (Foxxie, Kyla Lavi, Giselle69, etc)!
I have had a review rejected, but also received a reason for the rejection. All I needed to do was to alter the review to be in accordance with TER policies. It was no big deal.
My concern with reviews is that giving someone a bad review could mean trouble for the hobbyist as evident from prior discussions from those who have received less than favorable reviews. I will never provide a bad review of someone. After all, while I have left a provider feeling cheap, I have to question myself if the less than favorable experience was a result of the provider having a "bad day at the office" like anyone else can have, or was it something I may have inadvertently said or did to dampen the ocassion.
What is the point of having a review site if all things cant be written? If your experience at that point in time was bad, write it. Also, I have read reviews that were approved that didnt have the detail of mine that were rejected.
The worst hotels of 2009 list just came out based on consumer reviews. I appreciate the honesty.
By definition, if she was a no show, there was no encounter to review. This has been discussed on there boards before. Best to post a rant on a no show on the discussion boards.
I had one rejected too for the same reason (not detailed/specific enough). I spiced it up a little with more juicy detailed and re-submitted it; it then got accepted. Do not take too personal!
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!