Ok, so I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I get that.

Without naming her name, she has 90ish reviews and stellar ones at that. Her recent review was a 6/6. I personally have heard from several "established hobbyists" that she is indeed VERY Hot! And these gentlemen are very credible too! Let me make this clear, I am not a White Knight.

I'm not taking a shot at this recent reviewer for scoring her low. This just may be the case of a gent getting upset at a lady over YMMV. Again, I am respectfully disagreeing with the low scored review. I could be wrong, as I have never met this lady before, but I know "credible" gents that would say otherwise.

I'm using an alias because I don't want people to think I'm a WK

If you took a look at the reviewers other reviews and how he scored, you might not have made this post (IMHO).  And if that didn't convince you, read the guys review.

So to suggest you're NOT WK'ng for the provider is an oxymoron!  Just because you see a gal as a 9/9 or better doesn't mean the rest of the world has to agree with you.  And when they don't you post this stuff to out the guy!

Get over yourself.  I have seen many of the gals that I have seen receive scores lower than I might have judged.  But that is the nature of this game.  

And many times your "established hobbyists" have their own agenda..and particular preferences.

If you look at his other reviews he typically scores 1-2 points below the average of all the other reviews for a lady.  I'd chalk it up to him just being a tough grader.  I don't put a whole lot of stock in the review scores, but rely more on the juicy details and it does sound like he was pleased with the lady and services provided.

Everyone is different of how they "view" a providers attractiveness. I myself, don't go by just the body and face. I add in hair, eyes, smile and a few others. If I went just by looks alone, the providers I've seen would be in the 7 range, maybe higher. I'm getting older and I look beyond just the body and face. I've noticed from reading highly reviewed providers, they always have a few bad reviews. It happens, it seems. And, the reviewers other reviews are pretty consistent. He's tough. Maybe he's one of those, "i can do whatever I want to these girls". Then finds out he can't, the downgrade begins. If you know the provider is awesome, who cares?

Doesn't questioning the validity of a review go against the entire purpose of this site?  Was it not accepted by TER?  6/6 is not BAD btw.  This is all about chemistry and not everyone is going to click.  Before anyone attacks me for not having any reviews, I'm a newbie with two reviews on the way, including one with this "unspoken" about provider, whom I thought was quite lovely and genuine, but we all have a right to our opinion.  Perhaps 9's and 10's are thrown around too often?

Does any of this sound familiar?

" body is smoking hot"

"bbbj above average"

"nice b cups"

"recommend her, it was a pretty nice experience"

All from the 6/6 review of the provider you didn't name, that took me all of 10 seconds to figure out who it was. .

As mentioned before the reviewer is a tough grader. Did you even check to see his review history to get an idea of how he scores?  I've read the similar comments on 8/8 and above reviews.  

And by the way, you are WK'ing her and you're calling out the reviewer.

because of the details described in the review.  I thought that was total bullshit.  Yes, she did everything that would warrant a 9 if you will, but there was little to no chemistry.  Yes, you are white knighting. Simply because a person doesn't see it your way doesn't invalidate their opinion.

WOW that's a first  I have ever heard anyone say , since I came back to TER  in Aug. 5  of my reviewers were asked to lower my scores  and I provide what similair providers offer  with the exception I am NOT bi nor will I do anal....but the rest should still be able  to recieve  at least an 8 or 9 in preformance  according to guidelines  so go figure........I just hope men actually read the reviews they speak for themselves

I agree

Would certainly be BS the way you describe it here. Was this before TER changed ownership? Anyway, as I understand it, the guidelines require certain things happen before you can raise a performance score above a certain level, not that you have to raise it. A girl might swallow my load and let me visit Greece, but that doesn't automatically qualify her for a 10 in performance. It does automatically raise her POTENTIAL score here on TER.  Now, if I gave her a numeric rating that was inconsistent with the QUALITATIVE (how she performed and how I enjoyed my time, not so much what she did) verbiage in the write-up, then yes, I would expect to be asked to normalize my scores.