Chicago

Exactly
ModernLover66 701 reads
posted
1 / 6

This is increasingly common and it's annoying. People can download any kind of porn they want from the internet for free, why do you think people will pay subscription fees to look at your photos? I'm not talking about women who actually make and sell porn as part of their career, but regular providers who want people to pay to look at their face-blurred Aldo Antonio pics. If you're afraid of them being stolen all you have to do is watermark them.

All_In22 578 reads
posted
2 / 6

Scammers use obstructed pics and so do legit providers.  By using blurs a fake can claim the hot bod in the pic is her. It's harder to tell if the body really belongs to the girl that shows up.  True providers that blur want to maintain privacy as they have careers, families, friends .....lots of great providers blur.  Do research

ModernLover66 440 reads
posted
3 / 6

That's what I meant. I think it's absurd to ask someone to pay to look at photos. When I'm looking for a partner for the evening I'm trying to determine who I want to see, and photos are a part of the research. If I have to buy some kind of stupid membership to something just to do my research it's a huge disappointment and I just move on. And no, I'm not using the photos for jack off material (like I said the internet is filled with free jack off photos and videos of every variety). Who jerks off to mostly clothed, blurred face Aldo Antonio pics anyway?  

Anyone who pays to look at someone's photos just to decide if they want to do business with them is an idiot.

If people are worried about privacy it isn't hard to put your photos into a password protected area and require potential customers to ask for the password. Otherwise, it screams of a cheap and ultimately ineffective money grab.

HillaryLynk See my TER Reviews 492 reads
posted
4 / 6

I blur my photos because the city I am from (Palm Springs)  is a small town and its necessary to try to remain anonymous.I do have a password protected  section wich is a great  alternative to a pay per view section.  

 
Posted By: ModernLover66
This is increasingly common and it's annoying. People can download any kind of porn they want from the internet for free, why do you think people will pay subscription fees to look at your photos? I'm not talking about women who actually make and sell porn as part of their career, but regular providers who want people to pay to look at their face-blurred Aldo Antonio pics. If you're afraid of them being stolen all you have to do is watermark them.
-- Modified on 1/19/2015 11:27:17 AM

ModernLover66 279 reads
posted
5 / 6
Jacque_Jenesais See my TER Reviews 430 reads
posted
6 / 6

I know of ladies who have unblurred sections for VIP clients, and also the pics are a little naughtier.

I can see how it can be a turn on for a guy to have secret access to a provider he really admires. But the lady probably doesn't want her vagina blasted all over the internet for just anyone to see.

If it works, why not? Maybe she's only open to exclusive clientele, so she doesn't have any public photos.

If a guy doesn't want to see her because of it, I guess it worked.


-- Modified on 1/19/2015 6:37:34 PM

Register Now!