One tried to make me feel bad because I wanted to walk and the other threatened to black list me.

Photo shop is bad. Stop it!

It is my understanding that a review can be posted. A meeting took place and a 2 in performance is accurate.

If ever there were a reason to barter. Photos would seem to work. I mean how many sessions would it take? If the photog is gay or not into women, he has a friend that is and might be able to get them to substitute. I don't think they need to be professional quality as to set-up and scenery. Just someone with a decent eye and none of these horrid camera/mirror photos. How cheesy is that?

If a provider threatens to black list you for walking out due to dishonest photos, contact whomever you use as a reference service as soon as you can (RS2K, P411 etc)

Politely explain what happened and why you walked out and the threat you received. In a he said she said world, the more you CYA (cover your a$$) the better.

Hope that helps a bit.

Xoxo
VC

If so, you could update the build and then in a better world the provider profile would be changed to reflect that...

Really, why do I even bother with such a fantasy? That will only happen when FT takes his electric cattle prod on a visit to the review screening bunker.

Zig

Your butt is doing just fine.

I agree your photos are as much about personality as statistics.  Please keep bringing your photo essays on the life of Bebe.

I don't believe you write a review w/o seeing the lady.  I think you would have to pay for the session to write an actual review, which in my opinion is Bullshit.  If nothing else there should be a partial review process for providers that are dishonest like this.  It seems to me guys are much more comfortable telling about a bad experience in a review rather then posting it on the boards.
just my .02 cents
Doc

I think providers should update their photos a minimum of once a year. Yeah, I know it costs money to do this but using the same photoss for the last 3-4 years is total bullshit. If your finances are running that tight to where you can't afford it then you should be doing something else.

There are a few girls who I want to see but won't because they've been using the same photos for the last 3-4 years. I know, if the reviews are good, what does it matter? Because a lot of guys use most of the review to talk about the details of the session and are afraid of saying anything negative about a girls' appearance.

Good points.  A photo shoot should be a planned business expense every year.  It is also tax deductible, so the cost is even subsidized by Uncle Sam.  There is no excuse for using photos 3-4 years old, especially if their look and shape has changed considerably in that time.

As a provider, I try and update my photos quite frequently. But as someone who has been modeling on and off professionally for the past 6 years, I normally pay nothing. Perhaps some of the ladies should consider doing art modeling or portfolio work for art colleges...

Charlotte, I think girls can meet photographers and get pics for free by helping out the photographer through modelmayhem, yes?

The tax deductibility is a great idea....if you're filing taxes

I like my hanging upside down by my ankles in a xmas stocking pic.. and I LIKE my being painted like a cow in a mens bathroom pic.. and and and I LIKE my picture with my titties all covered in mud.  I like my pics and that to ME is what my site is all about... displaying my personality and not just what my body looks like as of an hour ago. Not everybody's site is all about business... sometimes it is about displaying our freak show!   But then.. I dont tend to draw people to me cause I am in any way shape or form gonna do things the way other people think I should either.

Buttt.. I guess I could hang upside down by my ankles every year with a stocking over my head and you all can let me know how much my BUTT has changed?

I'd like to see more pix of you at Burning Man. I've always wanted to go to that, but never had the time.

I'll take a cheesy phonecam snapshot over some of the "professional" shots I repeatedly see. I look for photos that show a real person. The photos can be artistic or moody or whatever, but I absolutely HATE seeing photos where someone has blatantly photoshopped the person's tummy or arms or whatever. It always looks like crap and is a total turn off.

Or even worse, the ones where the photo was taken in some sort of studio and then the photographer digitally inserts them into some other location, like a beach or in front of a grand staircase or something. Cheesy as hell and totally a sign the photographer isn't any good. A good photographer doesn't need all this low-grade enhancement, all they need is a model, a halfway-decent camera and light. Simple props are nice.

Bebe whatever are we gonna do with you????

I guess nothing, as there is nothing that hasn't been done to you Doll!  You haven't shown me your moves personally though  

XXX-Giselle