Stumbled on this recent review in the link which will certainly raise some eyebrows.

Yes, I saw that review.  But I didn’t realize who the girl was until your post.  He has a lot of reviews as does she. IF the reviewer describes it accurately he did me a favor since she used to be on my list.  IF it is not true he did her a real disservice.

I truly hope that is a fictional account, but I have seen several reviews like that.  Even saw one provider who said she is clean and her hobbyists are clean, so condom is optional...on her website. They either own stock in the new AIDS vaccine and are confident that it works, or they truly dislike guns so they found a new version of Russian roulette.

But she hasn't been available since August.

Wonder if someone has an axe to grind.

WTF is the difference between CIM and swallow? and come in ass bareback?  isn't swallow just as dangerous....yet seems that is a five star goal?  Please explain to me the difference, because maybe I am just stupid or something.

The provider in question is known to go beyond call of Duty.
That's why she is off my List.

You will be surprise how many established and well known providers will
Accept to go BBFS. I had one highly reviewd provider ask me once if I can
Provide a Medical Report that I am Clean then she will do it. And I did not
Even ask for this favor. She told me many Clients ask her and she ask them
To provide the Medical Report plus the Client has to be her regular to get
That favor. I told her if u give me your Report I will give u mine. She looked at me
Shocked that no one ask her that before.
That was the last time I saw her again.

But u can't trust anyone now so play it safe and stay away from any
Risk play just not worth it.

Not much difference in HIV risk of CIM vs Swallow. Big difference between CIM/Swallow vs BB Anal.

With oral sex, the entire digestive pathway is designed to deal with germs. With anal sex, there is a large risk of breaking the colon of the woman. That introduces a direct pathway for germs to infect her. The colon is not designed for sex (the risk for the man is just a little higher for anal vs vaginal sex).

For the lady, the risk of getting HIV is 50 times greater with anal sex vs. oral sex.
For the guy, the risk is 20 times greater, but half the risk of the lady.

Oral sex is the lowest risk of them all.

The BBFS issue has been discussed a number of times here with emotions riding high all the way around.  Is this a real review?  Perhaps, perhaps not.  I really don't care either way considering Lucia has seemed to have disappeared (UTR?) from the scene for some time now.

If the guys/gals take the approach that EVERY john/hooker is going bareback with someone, the "shock" of a BBFS review should indeed have no real meaning.  I have NO interest in fucking a gal bare here, and many share that sentiment.  But there is also a segment that actively seeks it out, along with those gals (and I completely agree with your comments on the availablity) willing to provide this activity.  Hence, put the condom on each and every time.  And for those wondering about the STD risks...go and educate yourselves at the CDC site...it's all there along with all types of discussions on these boards.

What the johns here better realize is that this type of review is simply a review that some guy posted...and for this purpose I'll assume it is real.  But johnny better be VERY concerned about all of the sessions with their favorite gals that AREN'T reviewed...and BBFS is happening!

Play smart and stay safe

Happy New Years to all!

Very interesting. . .but the most interesting statistic in the article is that condoms are only 85% effective in preventing transmission of HIV.  That means anal sex with a condom still seems like the proverbial Russian Roulette, still higher than BBBJCIM.

I agree with you the best approach is to play it safe but if I know that the provider might be involve in risky play then I won't even consider playing safe with her and my approach will be to avoid her completely. As we all know their is no such thing as 100% safe in this game and it has it's own Risks even you play it safe.

The provider I mention is not Active anymore, may be moved out or retired or UTR who knows but flags were raised and that was enough for me to avoid such providers.

Unfortunately BBFS is very common in certain parts of Europe and they think USA is too conservative not to do it. Europe has also strict rules to run Health Checks on providers every month so the Hobby is regulated and risks are minimum  so if their is a Demand their will be ample Supply, first rule of Economics. I hope gals think with their Big Head and say No to these requests or pay later.  

Use Protection even for a BJ !!!! 2012 Resolution.
Now go out and Enjoy the Big Night it will be Gorgeous !!!

Not sure if anyone had remarked on it previously, but it is the same story. In the instance, I had been wanting to see the provider for a while, but other issues that are also mentioned in the review have put me off her even before this was posted.

I have a lot of thoughts about all this, but the bottom line is that any provider who is routinely providing BBFS is nuts. Not quite as risky for the guy, I suppose, so long as he is really careful about not having any sores or cuts, and avoids DATY in most cases with that same provider, but I cannot figure out a way that the risk is worth it. But then, I tend to avoid all activities that pose a real risk of serious injury and death.

zig

ur too funny!  lol

Thanks for the link! very informative.

OK guys, thanks for the statistics.  Gals who swallow vs spitters are not deal breakers in my book but it is interesting to know the statistical difference in HIV transmission.  For my own safety's sake.  It's just that as an old man of 70 who is encoutering increasing trouble of getting my two cups worth, and fully enjoying a BBBJ it is nice to know that my risk is minimal.

Here's another review just posted today.  This provider apparently will provide bbfs for an extra tip. And no problem according to this fool "because she's on birth control".  Well, OK then.

http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1183381

This girl has had a lot of reviews up till now too.

To be fair, this reviewer only has one review up. The review may be a fake, or he's some beef against her - I should have noticed that first.   Please don't penalize the girl if it's not true.