What makes a good review for me is some who lists the attributes and skills they liked about me and what could improve. A bad review is when someone complains about every little thing and has nothing good to say or says something completely vague and you are left scratching your head trying to figure out what he meant. Reviews are meant to be constructive criticism, which means you say what you like or what you don't like without coming off as an a**hole or someone with a big ego. You can write a 5/5 review and be nice about it.
Guys what do you consider a good review that helps you determine if you are going to visit a certain provider? Is it the play by play review so you can put yourself in that session? Is it the brief paragraph that stated the date was overall a good time? Is there a review that falls in the middle of those?
Ladies, if you read your reviews, what do you like seeing in them? Do you like the fact the gentleman was able to relive the date into words play by play? Do you like the general overview of the date with out all the juicy details?
Other than the fake reviews that are posted by some to get VIP status, what makes a bad review? Granted anything that is stated that didn't happen is a bad review but if not called out by the lady how would we know?
I really don't care about the play by play details of a review, but I am more interested in making sure that a provider is legit and thus reviews help with that.
Agree with that, just like beauty, reviews are in the eye of the beholder (or writer in this case).
A good review tells me about the appearance and hygiene of the lady and incall location, what she does very well or doesn't do and whether she is just going through the motions or at least appears to enjoy the session and is attempting to make a connection other than with her genitals. Don't need to hear how many cups, which positions (except if she is unusually good in one), etc. Will you repeat soon?
A bad review is "How great I was in bad and really laid it to her!" with a "blow-by-blow" recapitulation, although that recapitulation is what TER specifically asks for. Enough detail, but not excessive is best.
What makes a good review for me is some who lists the attributes and skills they liked about me and what could improve. A bad review is when someone complains about every little thing and has nothing good to say or says something completely vague and you are left scratching your head trying to figure out what he meant. Reviews are meant to be constructive criticism, which means you say what you like or what you don't like without coming off as an a**hole or someone with a big ego. You can write a 5/5 review and be nice about it.
A good review, to me, is one that makes it clear whether it was worth it, given how large (or small) the donation was. I would hope that a high-priced provider would get a glowing review. If it's less than glowing, that says something worth knowing.
What was her location like? Clean, safe, upscale, or was it sketchy?
What is her physical type? Is she young or mature, slender, athletic, or buxom.
I do care about what a provider will and won't do, but a very brief discussion or list of those things is sufficient.
I like knowing whether the provider was reliable, i.e., did she meet on time as scheduled, or did she make it a chore to get to see her.
Was she interested in what she was doing or was it purely mechanical, or worse, tedious.
I like knowing if she was chatty or distant, and if she seemed like the sort of person one would like to spend time with before or after.
It's vital to know if there was something negative about the provider or her services. I understand that a single bad review must be taken with a grain of salt, and balanced against the other good reviews, if any.
Worth the money is too subjective. Inter-personal chemistry is probably out of anyone's hands. And $500 bucks to you is not the same as $500 to me
That makes sense.
I look for comments about how accurate the providers pictures are, and the general tone of the session. I don't need the fine details. I also look at the review history of those doing the reviews. If someone only has 1-2 reviews or only gives 8-9's I'm kinda skeptical of the validity of their reviews.
Whether a review is good or bad may depend on your expectations. If you are just looking for basic information like hygiene, appearance matching her ads, performance, and attitude, then the typical 75 word, 4-5 sentences found in the majority of reviews on TER may be ideal for you. However, even this type of review may contain an alphabet soup of positions and services, or reviewer performance details that you find irrelevant or annoying.
If you find the companionship experience to be important, then those reviewers who spend extra time writing more details about the provider’s appearance, customer service, attitude, conversation skills, intellect, and personality are giving valuable information that you need to decide if this provider is a good match for you. Again, a narcissistic description of the reviewer’s performance can be off-putting, on the other hand how the provider handled the inevitable ‘failures to launch’ on our part, could make someone feel more comfortable in choosing that provider.
When I first became a TER reviewer, several of my early reviews were rejected because they were not graphic enough. And there are a number of ladies who prefer not to be reviewed just because of the TER requirements for detailed descriptions. I respect their requests, and share their sentiments to a large extent. My current review style tends to be like the short program in ice skating competition, where there are certain key elements that have to be present in order for the review to be approved, but there is also a plenty of space for creativity and imagery that hopefully entertains as well as informs.
So do these extra details help or hinder you personally? I read a review recently for a provider I have seen, where he said something like, - when I dropped my boxers she said, “That’s a nice cock!” – and I was like, that is exactly the kind of thing she would say, she’s so naughty and so much fun – I need to book some time with her again soon! So that detail in a review brought back happy memories for me, and potential business for the provider (Win-Win).
Which of these two examples tells you more about this provider: (1) BBBJTCCIMS; or (2) …me until the last drop and I almost passed out. Then she looked up at me with those mischievous eyes, climbed up my body while licking her lips and said, “Uhmmmmm, you are sooo yummy!” then kissed me hard on the lips?
I have a favorite provider (you know who you are) who is really into fantasy novels. As a tribute, I wrote her a review transforming our date into an Indiana Jones type adventure. But to please TER I posted a typical one paragraph alphabet soup review at the beginning, and then invited the readers to try the stylized version that followed. She loved that I made the effort to create something special just for her.
With one special lady I remember (innocently??) asking her as she was about to put the cover on me, “You did remember to open the Magnum XL this time?”- we looked at each other for a second and then both began to laugh so hard that we were shaking and could hardly breathe, and had to hold onto each other as the tears were streaming down our faces. We could all do with more good honest cleansing laughs like that. Should I have left out a better than sex moment like that from my reviews? Or gents, does that make you want to meet her, or ladies, to want to see me??
I guess a good review tells the truth and gives you the information you need to decide if you want to meet someone. A bad review tells lies, gives false information, is fake, or doesn’t include key information that you are looking for. A great review does everything a good review does, but also entertains, displays creativity and insight, and is fun to read.
Suggestion for TER: Perhaps you could add some features to the Review Section that would allow readers to “like” reviews, or mark them “helpful”, or “entertaining”, etc. which might help folks who don’t want to read all 77