I understand the need for alias posts and anonymity.  But if you hide behind an alias to spew venom and criticize you are a little, little person.

Give me a hug....C'mon, come over here and give oldted a big hug.

I love you man.

We're cool, we're still cool.

Usually I dont care for alias posts cause they are many times ...... well they arent good.  But in this case in your previous thread I relooked at the alias's and they were much mmm kinder.  Venom isnt a word to describe them.  Allow people to disagree with you.  Telling people that the point went over thier head isnt the nicest words.  Maybe people missed your point,  then of course maybe your point wasnt clear.   I am not slamming you it is difficult to communicate a tone when writting these posts.

You tried to bash a girl for no good reason, and now you've started another thread to whine about it. Your point was clear, people just didn't agree.

And they were actually pretty nice about it. You're the one who seems focused on being nasty.

Soooo, without an alias, get onnn over it. Tis the Internet.

I gather by the title of your thread you are trying to call me out without actually naming me.

1.  I agree with Roadshow that I would not consider any of the alias posts "venom"  a little mean maybe.
2.  Why did you not just post it as a reply to the original post if you are going to keep saying your not talking about reviews or whitelists (something not in the original post that you added)
3.  Almost no one agreed with your post and now you create another calling people "little, little person" for criticising your totally offbase post

If you want to swim in the deep end, pull up your big boy pants and take off your water wings, otherwise go back to the shallow end of the gene pool where you came from!  (that my friend is venom)

btw your OP got no likes, my reply got 2   I WIN !!!!!!!!!!

You post a complaint/attack on a discussion board. Hardly anyone agrees with your point, and you post on almost every single reply to tell people that they just don't get it. Then you start another thread crying about people who disagree with you.

You failed to make your point. Providers, members, AND aliases disagree with you. I'd say YOU were the little guy in this fight.

And I'll speak to your first point as well. A provider should NEVER whitelist a client based on one session. She is putting her name on the line. Just because you showed up with clean balls, and weren't a cop or a psycho doesn't mean that she should recommend you to anybody who will listen. She might give a one-on-one reference to describe you and your behavior, but a whitelist (which is a blanket reference) should require a bit more.

Your posts never fail to make me smile or lol... And I don't laugh easily, you know...

Bri