Do you guys think that clients should boycott massage parlours.

I think the effect is all those hot women who want to make a quick buck will suddenly have to actually have sex rather then pretend to sell it.

After all, why pay a woman to do nothing except a naked massage, when to can pay her to lie on her back and ... do nothing.

Some people don't want FS.  The FBSM ladies provide a useful service that is high in demand...else...it wouldn't be there.  Some hobbyists also enjoy "the hunt" and fulfill a certain fantasy itch when then score with a mpa.  Regardless...there's a niche for massage parlors and probably always will be.  

As someone who has sampled both....I really enjoy FBSM.  Whenever I make a trip into Toronto, I schedule at least one fbsm session.  Some of those ladies are very talented with their hands and can provide very very satisfying releases.  I can still remember my last visit...probably the two best orgasms I've ever had back to back came with an mpa.  I was completely spent after.  

are you implying that you would be happy to create circumstances to "force" a woman to sell herself driven by necessity only?  

sorry but I find your choice of words deplorable and sad

I can also sell myself because of necessity. Problem is, no one would buy (except maybe you, honey), so I would have no customers.

I've been poor a good portion of my life, as in welfare checks, yet I've liven about the same "middle class lifestyle" that any poor person with a computer and television would have. This is Canada, eh.

In other words, a woman doesn't enter the sex industry by necessity.

They want to pay their student loans quickly, then vacation around the entire world for months at a time, before finding that one special client to spend the rest of a 5 year paid relationship with.

Then get a real job and be upset that she was "victimized" by the sex trade.

xxx

As a footnote, there was a ruling in Toronto about the sex industry and some of its questionable activities being legal.

The premise was because johns are dangerous and girls need protection.

The actuality, girls wanted to ply there trade without fear of arrest.

I will admit in their defence, the sex business is sometimes very dangerous, but I think the incidents are few and far between, and most girls can walk away if they have been victimized. So yes, maybe they court was right with regards to encouraging women to come forward to police about safety without fear of arrest.

However, I think the real reason is simply the girls seeing police as part of the problem, they feel victimized by the police arm of society infringing on their profits.

I'm not sure if I constructed these comments in a coherent way, I feel tried and bored.

Whatever.