Reviews are probably the most uncomfortable and disgusting thing about the sex industry.
[ Edit ]
How can you review (judge) someone on their sexual performance, when they met you thirty seconds before having sex with you? Sex is about a connection and attraction; [ Edit ] not a pretense.
[ Edit ]
They know it’s an illusion that they are paying for, so when the illusion is even minutely broken (for example if the escort makes the error of glancing at her clock) they storm home afterwards with self righteous indignation, to unleash their ‘disappointment’ in a review:
[ Edit ]
The fact that they are the buyer, gives them the power to judge what they get. Regardless of it being a human being.
The escort websites encourage reviewing as it keeps the men involved in the website, thereby keeping them addicted to punting, thereby keeping punting popular and ‘normal’ and thereby making sure their business remains incredibly lucrative.
Reviewing such an act is unfair, quite simply. You can’t review something so subjective. The men are just reviewing pretense, how good you are at keeping up a pretense, knowing it is a pretense the whole time. This may come as a surprise, but women are not [ edit ] toys.
[ Edit ]
We are on edge, we don’t know what you will be like, or what you will want from us, we don’t know if you will hurt us or not, we don’t know if we will find you bearable enough to let inside us until you arrive.
[ Edit ]
... generally the men who review are the entitled ones, the ones who enjoy the power they hold [ Edit ]
Reviews are hurtful and very, very personal. Obviously. What could be more personal than seeing written publicly, openly, for anyone in the world to see, what you are like having sex. The pressure is already massive on escorts to be ‘perfect’, and to know somehow what ‘perfection’ is to that particular punter.
It doesn’t matter if the review is a good one, it is still wholly offensive and disgusting even to have written it. Think about the power that punter has once he settles himself in front of his computer.
[ Edit ] About the power the review has; to hurt, to damage, to lower an escorts sense of self worth, to make her cry, to make her furious. He can choose how he wants her to feel. He can write a nice review as well, and maybe she won’t cry with rage or frustration. But the pride you get from a good review [ Edit ] isn’t pride at all, it’s relief, or something like relief. It is not joy, and it is not gratitude.
You are still a collection of body parts, nothing changes that, whether the review is positive or negative, you are still being reviewed.
Reviewers are the men who see punting as a hobby, something like playing golf with the lads, except afterwards they rate the golf course, like those hotel feedback forms, except it’s about a human being.
A review is like a notch in the bedpost to these men. The more reviews they have under their little online name, the more respect they get from their online ‘friends’, the more escorts are over eager to make them happy to share in that ‘reputation’. It is a way for them to show off how many escorts they’ve slept with, and to show off how much expendable cash they have to spend on their hobby.
A lot of them don’t see escorts who don’t allow reviews as she obviously has something to hide etc etc. It couldn’t possibly be that she doesn’t want her breasts critiqued for the entire world to read about? It couldn’t be that how well she give blow-jobs or how nice her ‘pussy’ looks is not something she wants described in detail on the internet? God no, it must be because she has something to hide, or she is somehow ‘dodgy’.
Not because she is a human being with feelings.
[ Edit ]
If you turn off reviews, [ Edit ] the punters won’t trust them. The website says they do this to ‘encourage escorts to allow reviews’) just to [ Edit - cater to ] those punters that get off on reviewing. It’s easy to spot these ones; they are overly descriptive, dripping with platitudes for the escort, or just salaciously describing the sex acts, her body etc. They will use language like not a bad punt, pretty good [ Edit ], nice little pussy, great tits, etc, until you feel like you are the blurb for a porn film. Until you feel that your body parts belong to these men.
[ Edit ]
Just shagging them isn’t enough. They rate your home, [ Edit ] the quality of the shower, ‘ambience’ (are you kidding me) in the bedroom, how clean and tidy the place is, etc [ Edit ]. So you have to have a show home, a show body, and a show personality. ‘Show’ is the key word here; a staged pretense of some perverse non reality.
Another thing about reviewing, the most sinister one I think, is how long time users of escorts, see their reviews as a necessary service, that they are providing to other punters.
[ Edit ]
They see themselves as crusaders in the face of fake photos, false advertising and deceptive descriptions. These are the ‘trusted reviewers’. Give me a [ Edit ] break. ‘Trusted’ reviewer. Cos yeah, these men are such stand up gentlemen.
They courageously and fearlessly battle the onslaught of wasted time waiting outside escorts apartments, unanswered phones, undecipherable text messages, girls who don’t dress ‘as requested’, girls who are ‘wider in the hips than the photos suggest’. Then they report back for the sake of the other punters, ‘giving back’ to their online community. The see themselves as valiant heroes, sharing their tips and valuable insight with other, less experienced fellow punters.
These are usually also the men who think they know everything about what escorting entails. These men think they are the experts, they think they have some inside knowledge just because they punt a lot.
[ Edit ]
Punting is a serious undertaking for this particular brand of reviewer.
[ Edit - Quote of guy commenting girls should appreciate reviews...]
... about girls (sorry, girlies) needing to show more appreciation to those that pay them for sex. This is how punters think. They are so entitled that they feel like they are doing the escort a service, not the other way around.
The other way around would reveal them as the creepy pervs that they are, so of course they have to twist it.
[ Edit ]
I am using this man as an example as he is the epitome of what all reviewers aspire to be like. He is cold and callous, and uncaring towards the girls; he sees it purely as a business transaction (yet when the transaction part of it is too obvious, he complains about it).
Here’s a tip, punters who review. Stop [ Edit ] reviewing. It’s disgusting and feeds only your own ego, makes you look like a massive knob and gives another punter something to wank over while he’s planning his next punt.
[ Edit ]
This is the really sinister side of reviews. Men will visit a girl who clearly, and the men admit this quite openly, doesn’t want to be there, is unhappy, is reluctant. And they review her anyway. They review her in such a way that completely and cleverly avoids any consideration for her, or why she is ‘lifeless’ or why she is ‘mechanical’ or whatever else.
Instead of wondering why and how the girl is in this position of unwillingly having sex for money, they are pissed off, indignant about their wasted money. This is what paying does; it takes the responsibility out of the punter’s hands. It takes the human out of both sides.
[ Edit ]
You couldn’t continue punting if you admitted that you are a user of vulnerable women, and then what would happen to all your precious, precious orgasms?! And what’s the most important things to a punter?
His [ Edit ] reviews and his dick.
