I recently submitted a review that got posted, for a provider that I had also visited with last month. The review that I wrote last month was also posted, however upon viewing my reviews in the account manager, I noticed that the original review from last month was listed as unapproved.

Does anyone know if violated the review process? I also noticed that I did not receive my VIP status upon the most recent posting as well.

one review for any provider. Otherwise, you could just keep writing reviews for your ATF, and have VIP membership forever.

I think there are exceptions, such as, if you were to have a double with the same lady and another, or if there was a tremendous difference in the two experiences with one lady.

Its got to be time related because I have written reviews on two other providers that I had seen twice but there was a much longer time span between the two.

You can review a lady again if there is a 90-day lag between reviews but you may not be awarded VIP credits depending on whether or not your moderater catches it or decides to go ahead & grant credit because of elapsed time & significant differences such as a massage provider that decides to go FS.

You can review the same gal again but you will only get VIP credit for the first review. Also, the older review will remain in your reviews history but will come down from the lady's list of reviews.

Please note, the moderators have absolutely nothing to do with approving reviews or awarding VIP days. If two reviews that you wrote for the same lady are still up in her reviews section it is a TER glitch.  Not the norm nor is it moderator related.

was having issues too if I read his post correctly -- personally I am concerned that the entire credibility of TER is starting to wane if the mods pick and choose what reviews to post or not.

The mods have nothing to do with the review process.

that if one part of TER is questionable then perhaps all parts are -- ever think that the mods potentially can post or not anything they feel like or not post stuff as well.  If Critter is not being allowed to post accurate reviews then its bad for all of us.

All I am reading so far is that CC, a newbie, has had reviews of other newbies rejected. This is and has been a policy for a while.

Taking steps to prevent fake reviews ( and no, I am not saying that CC is writing fake reviews) HELPS all of us, client and provider alike.

Sorry but I'm just not much for conspiracy theories...

I have seen Lisa of Boston and she is certainly NOT a newbie so at least one of CC's reviews is not newbie-newbie.  It will be interesting to see if his latest is also rejected.  I am very interested in both good AND poor reviews and limiting a potential reviewer is not good practice -- I can cull the reviews myself and certainly do not need a big brother to help me decide.

Lisa is certainly not a newbie. However neither you or I read CC's review of her. Whatever reason TER staff had for rejecting it is a topic of conversation for CC and TER staff.

Again, I'm not much for conspiracy theories.  You CALL IT "Big Brother". I simply see it as ownership of TER running their site in the way that they feel is most effective.

The newbie bord is full of guys like CC wondering how to get their reviews posted so this is really nothing new.  Thousands of new reviews go up every day.  Life goes on.