Apparently posting this same link, earlier this very day, had no effect.

So....to make it EASY....here is the link...again.

It's written in English and should be very easy to understand. There's even examples!
The only thing missing is drawings in crayon.

Good luck and have fun.

DD

too.

Oh, they are in english also.

Whoever wrote that regulation on Mini Reviews is an anal ....!!!!

And TER wonders why it is slipping,  Inane regulations is just part of it.  

Do you need crayons to understand that?????

It's normal behavior for someone to lash out when they get frustrated because something is too difficult for them to wrap their mind around.
Kind of like a little boy who throws his school book because he can't understand the questions.

Stick to pop-up books and you'll be fine.

no locals

Only visitors

But only if they have 3 or less reviews

and only within the period of time that they are physically present in the area,

and only if they are not blonde, vegans, left handed, or scorpio,

and only if ....

Too funny.

Why?
I have absolutely no idea. That's "above my pay grade" as they say.
Someone...somewhere....at some time....came up with that policy....and they aren't saying anything....LOL.

As for vegans....maybe we could suggest they get their own board?

Just sayin'

The reasons for the mini-review rules are fairly transparent based on the stipulations.
stips 1 through 3
TER wants to give newer unknowns an opportunity to become established. Visiting ladies can advertise and members can do research.

Stip 4 Keep the review as valid as possible and discourage self review.

Stip 5 an alias isn't searchable in the DB
Stip 6 doesn’t pollute the discussion board.
Stip 7 makes it searchable
Stip 8 makes it relevant data that is similar in content to that viewable by non-VIP members.
Stip 9 Forces the reviewer to add content to the searchable DB and boosts the providers profile.

old_lottery_ticket will now explain why that makes perfect sense.

Go to it old_lottery_ticket.

-- Modified on 1/12/2012 1:53:54 AM

-- Modified on 1/12/2012 1:54:01 AM

I got to give DD credit, regulating sexual deviants is hard enough in person never mind over the web.

But I think they flaw is that new visiting girls who go through a local agency like the cases with TDB are excluded from mini reviews. they may be new and it would be nice to see a review on thier first day to drum up intrest for the rest of the stay. If she's really good, we want her to come back. Maybe minis could some how be allowed for the first apperience of a new girl to a local agency. And only one thread for that first visit, then its at the mercy of standard reviews.

Or we could do it secretly in binary code

01001000011011110111010000100000011000100110111101100100011110010010110000100000011001110110111101101111011001000010000001100110011101010110001101101011

I wrote a mini review of Rachel O of The Belladonna.  She is visiting Boston for two weeks only and perhaps never again.  The mini was taken down.  I'm still scratching my head as to why.  I have posted mini reviews of other visiting agency girls and the review stayed up.  No rhyme or reason.

I just re-read the rules and I don't see where a review of a VISITING girl that is working with a LOCAL agency is excluded in any way unless
she has more than 3 reviews or 4+ with the latest entry less than 3 months ago.

DD do you concur?