Boston

Well, rather than forcing a structured tome down our throats.................
jhonny8770 40 Reviews 1445 reads
posted

Wouldn't it be easier for the mods to:
*look at the mini's individually (which you'll do anyway)
*determine if it was a self review or shill
*impose proper punishment for abuse
Where is the loss of control?!?
And all your asking for (IMO) does, in fact, give too much info for non VIP's!

Why is it that the majority must pay for the minority's crimes?
This is not the (painful!) review section, but a board for info sharing/thoughts.
What's next, a form for 'proper' communication between mongers?!?

Please read this and post all mini's accordingly

Thanks

Per TER posting guidelines, reviews of any type are not allowed on discussion boards, because their proper place is in the review database.  However, the use of mini-reviews is warranted by the need and desire of hobbyists to share review information on visiting providers whose local availability may have ended by the time a formal review is submitted and approved. Based on those conditions, mini-reviews are allowed on the discussion board, provided they meet the guidelines below.

Mini-Reviews may not be posted on local providers, regardless of whether they have TER reviews or not.  Local providers will still be here next week, so no sense of urgency exists on sharing review information.

Mini-Reviews may only be posted on visiting providers with 3 or fewer TER Reviews.  If a provider already has 4 or more TER Reviews, a Mini-Review is not needed -- look up the existing TER Reviews in the database.

Mini-Reviews may only be posted on visiting providers with 4 or more TER Reviews if none of the TER Reviews were posted within the past 3 months.

Mini-Reviews may only be posted by established TER members with 5 or more existing TER Reviews.

Mini-Reviews may only be posted using your TER reviewer username - aliases may not be used.

Only one Mini-Review thread per visiting lady is allowed.  Additional Mini-Reviews by other members may be added to the original Mini-Review post.

The Subject line of a Mini-Review post should be structured as follows:
 Mini - [ProviderName of AgencyName/CityOfOrigin]
examples:
Mini - Wicked Witch of TinMan Companions
Mini - Dorothy of Oz

The Message body of the Mini-Review post may only include the following info:
Recommended:  yes/no/ymmv
Rating:  may range from 1/1 to 10/10 (appearance/performance)
GFE:  yes/no/ymmv, or may use the GFE+++ scale
Services:  list acronyms/terms of offered services only
Rates:  rate/time of your encounter
Incall:  yes/no - if yes, list general geographical area
Outcall:  yes/no/unknown
Photos:  accurate/glamour/old/B&S

A link to the provider's current web site or escort mall ad must be included in 'link URL' box.

Providing a photo link in the 'picture URL' box is acceptable.
Additional text is acceptable but it may not have as many details as a formal review.

Mini-Reviews not meeting the format requirements will be removed or modified.

Mini-Reviews must be followed by submission of a full, formal TER review to the TER review database within 72 hours. Violators of this policy will lose their message posting privileges.



I just realized that the people coming up with these rules must have been US Senators and Representatives in a former life.

Why even bother to write a mini?

You need to spend an hour just making sure that you satisfy all the preconditions.

Frankly, how many visiting ladies would even qualify for a mini under this regulation?

haha.. i could not even get through it.  Kudos for drafting it but it reminds me of tax law :)

I know that the mods don't write the rules.  I also understand that it is their job to enforce them.  My issue is with the policy and not with SFG for deleting my post in order to enforce it.

Honestly I was less aggravated about the whole thing BEFORE I re-read the policy.  I understand that TER's revenue base is completely dependent on full reviews and VIP membership but making people stand on their head while jumping through hoops just so they can give a quick heads-up to fellow hobbyists about a new girl in town is, in my opinion, counterproductive to the very existence of the regional boards.  

I'm willing to bet that if I had put my post as a response to the lady in question's ad post it would still be there.

I saw a visiting lady with no reviews.  I had a good time. I wrote a short paragraph to tell folks about her.

Don't worry, I won't bother next time...

But you seem bent on not hearing them.  

1. The board would be full of nothing but shill mini's

2. There would be no need to have full reviews which are accessible only to VIP's.

3. There would be fake, self reviews all over the place.  When all you need is a user name, TER loses control over the process.

These things have been proven.

It is natural to resist rules and regulations, especially by a cultural subset like us hobbyists, but the reason for the rules make sense and they are not all that onerus anyways.

This is TER's sandbox, and you can always start your own site.  More sand for the rest of us.

First of all SoflaGuy just reposted what ADMIN has set forth as the guidelines. These are TER guidelines, not SoflaGuy's guidelines. If the folks here don't like the guidelines, then write admin and say you think the rules should be changed.

As a visiting lady in Boston these guidelines don't benefit me at all because I have pages of reviews. Would it be nice to get a mini review during a stay in a city I'm visiting, yes. That being said, If it really bothered me, I'd write admin. Maybe if enough people do it will change, who knows. That's TER's call.

TER isn't a perfect system, but I think it's the best review site there is, hands down. I like playing in the TER sandbox! ;-)

xoxo,

Steph

I know who owns the sandbox.  I'm usually the first one to tell the whiners that if they don't like it they can leave. Maybe it's just old age setting in but it occurs to me that, since TER is trying to promote itself as a community for the provider and hobbyist it might be OK, just once in a while, to complain about something that you don't necessarily think is being done the right way.  Will TER change the rules because I bitched about it? No, of course not, but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the right to bitch about it.

Wouldn't it be easier for the mods to:
*look at the mini's individually (which you'll do anyway)
*determine if it was a self review or shill
*impose proper punishment for abuse
Where is the loss of control?!?
And all your asking for (IMO) does, in fact, give too much info for non VIP's!

Why is it that the majority must pay for the minority's crimes?
This is not the (painful!) review section, but a board for info sharing/thoughts.
What's next, a form for 'proper' communication between mongers?!?

I actually do look at each one.  If they are even close to adhering to the spirit of the rules, I leave them up.

I put the rules up so that you can read them and post a valid mini.  That way neither one of us has to go through the hassle of disapproving them.  Believe it or not, I don't like disapproving any posts.

These are TER's policies, not mine.  They are copied directly from the board policy posts.  I do not make any rules, I just enforce the rules TER has set.  Very seldom do I have to use judgement in leaving a post up or not and when I do, I always try to lean in the direction of leaving them up.

I hope this helps.

and believe me when I say, I'm still in 'pinch-me-I'm-dreaming' mode having you here and not your predecessor.
It wasn't you (the monger or the mod) I was talking/venting to, but our TER 'rep'.
So when you and your compadres are hanging, you can say, "Hey, some of my guys said this/that and I thought they might have some validity".

That I don't understand the need for rules.  I just don't happen to agree with them all the time.  I didn't just join TER. I've been around here for a while...

Sorry but the process is just too much work to go through for a quick affirmation that a new gal may be worth seeing. It discourages rather than encourages participation which, I thought, was part of the "new" TER's mantra...

"Mini-Reviews may not be posted on local providers, regardless of whether they have TER reviews or not.  Local providers will still be here next week, so no sense of urgency exists on sharing review information."

AHHH!??!  Local Ladies have expenses & overhead, just as Visiting Ladies do.

Since you have limited the Minis to Ladies

-with 3 or fewer TER Reviews

OR

-with 4 or more TER Reviews but none posted within the past 3 months.

This would only apply to very few ladies whether they are locals or visitors.

Oh ya, no urgency with local ladies, I keep forgetting.

.

Isn't it true that a provider either local or touring that posts and ad can have a response that might have a fair amount that looks like a mini, but does not count as a mini as it is a response.

Therefore, if my premise is correct all we need is the provider to start a post and let the good times roll.

You are correct.  That is an opportunity for anyone who wants to shill any provider...every 7 days, in fact.

The "provider of the week" is also an open invitation for shilling"  I think it comes up on Saturdays.

Live with the rules, they are all created based on experience.

Clearly since people can't come to a consensus, then why can't these rules be re-written?

Simple concept really.

Oh and to add to my take:

I see why the rules are there and I understand their enforcement.  But like many rules and laws, the time comes when sometimes we need to sit down and discuss them and change things if needed, etc.

My biggest problem with the rules is the threat:


Mini-Reviews must be followed by submission of a full, formal TER review to the TER review database within 72 hours. Violators of this policy will lose their message posting privileges.


Why in the world would I risk my posting privileges to post a mini that gains me nothing? Regular review policy gives months to post your review yet upon posting a mini I need to clear my immediate calendar???

No thanks and no minis from me.





 

Posted By: Rpm2007
My biggest problem with the rules is the threat:


Mini-Reviews must be followed by submission of a full, formal TER review to the TER review database within 72 hours. Violators of this policy will lose their message posting privileges.


Why in the world would I risk my posting privileges to post a mini that gains me nothing? Regular review policy gives months to post your review yet upon posting a mini I need to clear my immediate calendar???

No thanks and no minis from me.

This whole subject is why I never write any reviews.  The few times I tried to write them, I was so frustrated by the process that I just gave up trying.  If you are going to have rules and expect folks to follow them, they need to be reasonable enough that they can be followed.  I agree with Bostonguy the process is just to complicated to work through.....   .....So I just leave it up to others to slog through the rules and regs to write reviews.  I just read them, and thank all of you for your hard work





 

I looked at those rules way back when and decided that no way would I post any mini reviews. Screw that.

Furthermore, as slowly as reviews are sometimes processed, I have no confidence that even if I submitted the real review slightly in advance of the mini, there wouldn't be a book keeping error.

Thanks everyone for your input.  Please note that there is a suggestion and policy board on TER for things like this.  This is a great place to start.  TER has always shown they will listen to well thought out suggestions.


http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/messageList.asp?boardID=4

Register Now!