Looking for someone to just clarify an occasional situation I see with reviews...
for example... I see a--

Great looking advert...lady with no reviews.
New review for said provider then appears written by someone who is writing a first review.

This does not seem to be in keeping with the theme of keeping this safe for providers and clients alike.   or did this kinda just slip through the crack?...as it were...     or is the volume of reviews so great that there is difficulty in monitoring?

just wondering.  too much free time on my hands today.
granted, the "giggles and grins" provided are a big part of the reviews.  Still, there is some legitimacy to the process, right?

but in fairness to TER, perhaps this reviewer has several other reviews pending and has done enough other things like posting, etc. to earn the publishing of his review.