There is a good thread a couple of pages back discussing frustration with the TER review rating system. The problem starts when reviewers don't follow the guidelines. The "'Review' reviewers" don't catch all the mistakes...that's one of the reason the Problem Report feature exists. TER appreciates your help. That's why you earn free VIP time when your PR's are approved. Just my opinion.

Happy Holidays everyone!

thirsty

Could you post a link to that thread you are referring to?

I would comment that it goes both ways.  If you see a review where the rating given was too LOW (according the the guidelines), you can also submit a problem report.

...So what is the problem, then, with the last review of Alyssia??  Her URL is on Escorts.com..which is a (genuinely free) membership site...all you have to do is register and you can get to her interview page, and contact info..  If that specific URL is entered...it still requires you to register and log in.  All of the previous reviews of Alyssia use the same exact URL that I entered in the review that I gave her...so what is the problem???  "Staff" is completely ignoring the whole thing.

JJim.  Due to privacy laws (invasion of privacy) There are certain legal restrictions concerning publishing contact information.  In order for TER to publish contact info, it has to be available to the open public (thereby removing the invasion of privacy).  If her contact info is membership only, it is not availably to the open public, we cannot publish it.

I set allyssia and every provide on that site "bad website".  If those providers would like to be listed on TER, there are ton's of free sites that do not require a membership to see provider information. I credited your account 15 days for the misunderstanding.

-- Staff

Perhaps...(but I doubt it).  Thing is..the URL I listed, same one which was in her current TER profile (until you apparently took it down just now) opened up to a main page that described her completely.  So what's the problem???  The decision to register and log in (or not) to get to her contact information is solely that of the person looking at it; and this is how she wants it.  
How is listing this an "invasion of privacy laws"???  What "privacy laws"??.