Boston

Re: misrepresentation...
petzl 16 Reviews 2464 reads
posted
1 / 13

I don't post much but I had an experience today which pissed me off.  Is it common for a provider
to say that she is "GFE" and then to have no kissing, no DATY and CBJ only?   Before I get torched for being ugly and ill-kempt, I showered and shaved immediately before the appointment. Certainly, every hobbyist on this board is handsome, so that's a given.
And yes, I am stupid for seeing someone without reviews.
Should I write a review to clarify the situation?

hungry1951 29 Reviews 1989 reads
posted
2 / 13

definitely write a review, and yes it sucks. At one time or another, we've all let our peckers run away with our wallets, but the best you can hope for is that it's all part of your education, and that you've learned something. If you go out this weekend, and do it again, then you can call yourself stupid, and we can join you, and call you stupid, as well.

So, write a review, do some research, go see a well reviewed lady, and get that bad taste out of your mouth.

dingalingus 109 Reviews 1627 reads
posted
3 / 13

Absolutely, and to let people know that someone is advertising a service that is not being provided.  People need to be able to make informed choices.

petzl 16 Reviews 1594 reads
posted
4 / 13

I regretted posting the message as soon as I did...
1. Of course I should write a review!
2. I sounded like a whiney bitch
3. Yup, real stupid.  Misery likes company and so perhaps I needed someone else to say...done the same.  Fact is, similar posts are all too frequently written.  Pecker-wise? I think not.
4. The advert said nothing. I called before to clarify and was told GFE.  When I questioned the "working environment", I was told "well, you don't use condoms with a girlfriend".  etc etc
On the bright side, I didn't get my ass kicked. I beat the traffic home.  Philosophically, I can spread the money lost over the 40+ awesome experiences I have had--- and it averages well less than 5 cents per experience.  I got off cheaply.

LOL thanks guys.

bigbee 154 Reviews 1230 reads
posted
5 / 13

Definitely write a review, but given they can take 3-4 days to show up, raise the issue on the board including a link to the offending advertiser. By the time the review hits you may have lots of unhappy company. This is a board ofr end-users, so a proper post saying you got a YMMV situation is good for the end-users to decide if the risk is for them.

I was going to visit one of the two Portland area blondes visiting in Back Bay, but now have to wonder if they are the false advertisers where you've left the who out of the post.

petzl 16 Reviews 1912 reads
posted
6 / 13

Miko on Eros.
I think your comment is accurate.  YMMV.
Given the constraints of her definition of GFE--as inaccurate as they may be, I have but no doubt she would have been enthusiastic and given a decent experience...but I would not have seen her if I knew of these restrictions.   Pictures are accurate.  She is very pretty.  In the final analysis, I bailed out on her, not the reverse.  She would have  continue the appt but I just wasn't into it at that point.  Not what I came for...no pun intended.

helio10 3 Reviews 2530 reads
posted
7 / 13

I don't post here very much either, but I must say. Well put hungry1951. I will admit that i've had a couple bad experiences, but also so many more good ones to make up for it....

WickJohn 26 Reviews 1231 reads
posted
8 / 13

I , and a few "friends", had been eying her as she appears to be very attractive.
You saved at least me, from making a  big mistake!

skyjockey 65 Reviews 2077 reads
posted
9 / 13

This is exactly what this site is all about !  Glad to see it is working

UnSub 1795 reads
posted
10 / 13
jordan.lee See my TER Reviews 2076 reads
posted
11 / 13

It's only fair, in my opinion you totally should. Not to put the provider out on blast but be as honest as possible, i.e. if she was pretty then rate accordingly then rate the session separate. I have seen in the past if a provider makes someone mad by false advertisements, the review shows up a 2 for looks and 2 for session when the model is totally hot...

petzl 16 Reviews 1128 reads
posted
12 / 13

exactly as I did.  she was very pretty-- and graded accordingly.
As for the performance, I graded her a little on the high side. "5" I think. as I believe that she would have performed well-enough given her "restrictions".  The episode was explained in the body of the review.    A "2" would have be a bit extreme and almost vindictive.  Just not my style.

MassGuy79 8 Reviews 1533 reads
posted
13 / 13

petzl

Please write a review it helps us other hobbyists in making a decision about who to see or not to see.  

thanks in advance

Massguy

Register Now!