Here's a question inspired by all of the talk surrounding Susan Boyle, that British woman who was not very attractive (sorry, she wasn't!) who had great singing talent:

Identify the provider that has the greatest disparity between their attractiveness (low) and their services (high).

Going the other way is easy; there are lots of gorgeous women who can't perform worth a damn.

But how many woman have low attractiveness ratings, yet are able to achieve top service marks.  I would like to know.

Any candidates?  The entry with the greatest disparity between looks and talent wins a Susan Boyle CD.

I am the PERFECT EXAMPLE! I have regulars that have been loyal to me because I offer them discretion comfort just and a performance that leave every man asking why they waited so long to answer my posts. I'm just not a skinny model type. As a BBW I ROCK!!!!!!

Tess who used to post on CL.  Not a looker at all, but fantastic french skills

Are you attempting to ask if there are woman who are not attractive, in your opinion but still exceed the gentlemans fantasy? Are you also asking the gentlemen here to name such woman?
well how about asking this one of yourself...
is this question a bit over the top?
In the end wouldn't it only serve to insult the Lady?
I think its a classless question, and I see no reason to call out a lady on her looks in a negative aspect. A true Gentleman would never do that.

Sorry, but I think it's just as interesting as very attractive women who have no idea what to do in bed.  

I am not calling anyone out (see Susan Doyle.)

Hey Chuckie, I have met some hot guys who are clueless as well.

But I will say this has usually occured in my personal life.  Hobby guys are usually loads of fun because they are so horny.  Mmmm

KJB

I have to say ... if I were aware of such a woman, I wouldn't name her in a thousand years and possibly hurt her feelings.

I met a provider once who was very sensitive about what she perceived to be a flaw in her anatomy. She practically cried when she told me how hurt she was to see guys mentioning it on another site. (She didn't have a profile here so I couldn't review her.)

One should be aware that even providers who never post on a board might *read* it sometimes. They are real live human beings engaged in what can be very difficult work. I don't care what a woman looks like: if she has treated you kindly, then you return that.

This particular provider, by the way, mentioned to me that some hobbyists had treated her in a demeaning fashion as though they were her moral superiors. Wouldn't it be interesting to see whose names SHE would post?

Personally, and just in my humble opinion, I think this is a topic best left alone. We put an awful lot of faith in providers; and the fact we have made a payment doesn't absolve us from our end of a reciprocal responsibility.


-- Modified on 5/14/2009 7:54:20 PM

Very well said Sir, I would agree this question if hurtful, I am sure it was not intended to be.  Even the most beautiful women in the world are sensitive about their looks, if you start posting on their negative aspects you are going to hurt them and make yourself look bad in the process.  Just my opinion of course...

Play nice and very nasty!

Ashley

Chuckie,  I have never met a provider that wasn't beautiful,  some are simply more so than others and in many different ways.  In case you haven't experienced it,  Nature provides for every woman to look absolutly beautiful while in the midst of enjoying sex and at the moment of climax and the period right after.  God they look so wonderful.

After all the cat-calling, I think we have a winner.  And she is:

Ashley, of NC, with a very impressive string of 8s and 9s for service.

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=129107

Congratulations.