Thanks for the warning!

You know what is disturbing to me?  The comments people made about the rape (comments in the Ledger online)- I mean I am not naive- I am well aware what the general population think about providers but are people really still that ignorant about rape to consider it strictly about a sexual act?  The comments all said "oh she didnt get paid- so she cried rape"

I can't imagine anyone wanting to go through all that over money-  

Clearly rape is about violence- A violent attack that the perpetrator may have felt entitled to because of the monetary exchange.

I understand the article claimed her story to be "inconsistent"- Her first instinct in the face of law enforcement was probably to deny her genuine reason for being there and of course that would demean her credibility but c'mon is she really going to call the police and be humiliated over money?  I think not.

I expect people removed from a hobby/provider lifestyle to judge- but I have to say I was genuinly shocked at the insensitivity and ignorance about rape- In this day and age I expected people(even Ledger readers) to understand the violence, anger and control involved in this crime.

My heart goes out to the young lady and I hope she never reads any of those comments!

I have to say, I was stunned by the callous approach the responders took. Rape is rape, regardless of why two people are in the same room.

Rape is Rape.  Consenting to one thing does NOT give permission for anything his heart desires.  I doubt that any provider would report a Rape unless it was pretty serious.  She has a lot to lose by going public...  
Throw his hairy ass in jail!  
skb