The numeric ratings seem to be too often a crap shoot.  Some rate extremely high in hopes of.......

Some rate with the concept that a ten is really a once in a life time and anything above 5 is positive.

If one just looks at the ratings rather than the review, remember to truly value the averages.

Numbers don't mean much anymore, after all I've seen 7's with "should have stayed home". If you have a 7 at home, what gives?

I agree with you...

Appearance : 7 - Attractive does not equate mentally to me as "absolutely lovely" or "stunnning", although he later does summarize her as "very attractive".

Performance : 7 - Hot Time sounds like the description, but she is eligible for a 10 based upon her menu. I would have expected an 8 or 9 from the description.

If you look at her reviews statistically, the review is not outside of what you would expect for appearance; it is just shy of 2 std devs from the low score you might expect without special cause. In this case, the review makes it plain there was no special cause and the reviewer looks like he is a habitually low scorer on appearance. For performance, his score seems to be about the same; statistically normal, but so far on the low side as to almost be an outlier - and in my view not what he described.

Hard to knock the scores as they are to be expected sooner or later on a normal curve, but I'll bet I can show that the reviewer is habitually a low scorer, regardless of his words.

Sorry, I was bored and had excel open