Write Review
2,076,882 Total Reviews 3,697 New Reviews
9,614 Users Online

Boston

Question on tattoos
augustwest 46 Reviews 2281 reads
posted

For the men: Do you find tattoos on a woman attractive? Do you like the big ones on the arms, and elsewhere, like Candi in the above mentioned post?

For the ladies: What do you think of tattoos on ladies AND men?

Personally, on a woman, I find a strategically placed small tattoo sexy. Larger ones on a woman, especially on the upper arm, are a turn off to me.  That doeasn't mean I won't see a particular woman, but there must be a significant other attraction to me to look past that.

DT_lover5132 reads

Three ads on EROS from this agency.  Pictures of Candi caught my eye.  My kind of woman...in the pictures anyway

http://www.eros-boston.com/files/bo-ultiplez1-candi1.htm

http://www.eros-boston.com/files/bo-ultiplez1-dana1.htm

http://www.eros-boston.com/files/bo-ultiplez1-eve1.htm

I called the number and the man who answered was not very informative.  No conclusion at this time.  Maybe he was just being cautious to avoid questions LE might ask.

Anyone have any experience with any of these girls?  300 seems a bit pricy for unknown girls with no reviews.  And I don't understand why such good looking girls would not have any reviews.

-- Modified on 10/16/2005 9:16:10 AM

-- Modified on 10/16/2005 9:20:01 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
augustwest2282 reads

For the men: Do you find tattoos on a woman attractive? Do you like the big ones on the arms, and elsewhere, like Candi in the above mentioned post?

For the ladies: What do you think of tattoos on ladies AND men?

Personally, on a woman, I find a strategically placed small tattoo sexy. Larger ones on a woman, especially on the upper arm, are a turn off to me.  That doeasn't mean I won't see a particular woman, but there must be a significant other attraction to me to look past that.

ReplyQuoteReport
Red Sea Pedestrian2923 reads

I'm not sure what tattoos have to do with this thread but the only ones that turn me off are the numbered kind on the arm.

ReplyQuoteReport
voiceinthewilderness3155 reads

In the words of a reliable and well known fellow:
"Guys stick with what and who you know , always the real deal , real people, never a bait and switch."

Eros is really 90% fake. Can anyone argue with that ? If any of these eros "model material" girls were real we would of heard about it by now. Yes, of course there are hidden gems. Abby St Claire is a prime example. If no one had given her a try we would have never known what a treasure she is, but that's my point, the truth eventually comes out. There are so many eros providers who have been on there for months on end and not a word about them. It's a good site for dreaming..but that's about it :(

ReplyQuoteReport
DT_lover3301 reads

VisitingGirlfriends,  Eastern Companions, BellaDonna come to mind, as well as reputable agencies from out of town that are touring through Boston.  

Is there an alternative?  Can EROS be convinced to control the validity of their ads?  There may be a moneymaking opportunity here for some sharp webmaster to start something new.

-- Modified on 10/17/2005 5:52:09 AM

ReplyQuoteReport
vics_lilsecret3862 reads

As long as the providers/agencies are the ones to pay for an ad on Eros nothing will change. Why? Eros is like any other capitalist organization...primary aim is to make money. The more ads they have placed the more $$$ they clock.
If Eros gave free ads to women/agencies and the gents had to pay for access then Eros would have more of an incentive to control who advertises (much like TER). The way TER gets you guys to continue with membership is to give you an incentive to come back (i.e controls fake reviews,etc).

The truth is that any advertising mall aimed directly at women doesnt care about authenticity...just the number of ads they can turn over. The problem with the previous approach I mentioned is that gents dont want to pay to view sites like Eros (understandably so)...so where is the middle ground?
It's a tough one!

V

ReplyQuoteReport
vics_lilsecret3599 reads

I gave this a little more thought.
What if a site only allowed women with say 3 TER reviews to advertize on there. The 3 reviews have to come from gents with a certain amount of reviewing history behind them.
Yes this unfortunately cuts out the lurkers and non-reviewers from the equation and also new providers/agencies but more importantly it still wont work!
Why?
Just as there are B & S providers there are also hobbyists who will use their "pull" to manipulate women ("I can review you so you can advertize on X site and get more biz")...so it just shifts the power from one unreliable source to another. Solves nothing.

Just as the ladies have to screen for safety and security it seems that the gents will have to screen for validity and I dont see a change to that at any point. It seems its all about screening for both sides...

V

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!