Boston

Prostitution should be decriminalized...
havetopay 2280 reads
posted

then providers wouln't be able to charge so much for what men want. Most resent the fact that they "have to pay" anyways.

Maybe it should be decriminalized so that women CAN provide what men want without having to worry about LE. Or anyone who is against what they provide, if they don't like it, they don't need to indulge, by why not allow providers to make a living?

What makes you think it would be cheaper if it were legal? Once government agencies get involved the price of any service goes up, not down!

At the legal brothels in Nevada the prices are two or three times higher than what I pay my favorite ladies for an hour and, quite honestly, the ladies that I see on the sites for those brothels don't impress me all that much!



-- Modified on 12/26/2007 3:31:42 PM

I think there is a difference between decriminalized and legalized. Legalized probably would mean you'd need a license to operate. Government would have rules and regulation, no different than setting up a regular business. Decriminalized means to me, that LE wouldn't bother you if you were doing it. Common sense would require it be somewhat UTR and not flaunting it. So an attitude of do it, just don't make it obvious that people would complain about you doing it. LE's attitude could be we're not actively looking to get you.

It occurs to me that sticking with well respected ladies and exercising caution while engaging in hobbying activities comes pretty close to achieving the goal of LE not actively looking to get you now...

I can't remember the last time I was worried about LE...actually I can, it was when Craig's list refugees La Bella Girls and the Quint st massage place were around....and I was dumb enough to be a customer of both!

It's not the hobbiest I was talking about, I'm speaking of the providers.

Register Now!