And you found out who, would you trust seeing her in the future

Are you talking about "The rumors have been confirmed" thread (below) and the alleged snitch? Like the others: never.  

If not she should think about leaving town.

But then that is often the case as providers either change agencies or go independent.

the were investigated. I too had that same feeling that a provider started it. Ladies have been know while working for an agency to take off with cash, get angry because the agency does not want to work with them anymore and they lady turns on them. I know they were around for a while and never heard anything bad about them.  

"Could not understand why they were investigated" ?   WTF .,,,???The Waltham police got a complaint of illegal activities, they were investigated, they were found to be suspected of running a prostitution ring. The charges of money laundering (et al) speak for themselves. All of this is ILLEGAL! Plenty of posts on here claiming the agency had it coming because of the treatment of the girls. Others posts support them.

If you read my post you should I have "I" never heard anything bad about them, but than again I'm not local to Boston. Usually when I read of agencies getting busted they mention the mistreatment of girls. I read no such thing, not that it did not happen.  

Girls don't "start investigations" and if they get involved with the courts, their name generally have to appear in public documents.

Always been a Huge Fan of 'Independent Ladies' and establishing good relationship with them (my likes & needs...their schedule, pampering they like etc..conversation topics & the obvious bwtn sheets). Agencies were never my thing and after feeling like I almost got caught in the middle of things, I'll  be going back to sticking with independent providers. But definitely laying low around here for a bit..

If it happens to you.

In the NYC AMP bust last year (resulting primarily in Fed money charges), were able to threaten a mama-san with other charges. Another was also squeezed. The court papers only named Cooperating Witness-1 and Cooperating Source-1, not their actual names. I forget which one was the mama-san, CW or CS. Everyone involved easily figured out who it was even without the name in the records.  

I think police test all these cases the same . It doesn't matter the girls were working of their own free will. They treat all these cases as if they are smuggled in from Russia.

There have been a couple "houses" shut down in Boston recently (Nov/Dec).  

Probably if the Girl was mad enough, they would drop a dime on the Agency, but most, if not all, would not want to be the star witness!

No money has to be exchanged  to get charge with a crime. They don't need anyone to testify against them. The AG's have have phone records,text messages and emails from clients and girls. In addition I'm sure it won't be hard to get one of the girls and tell them if you cooperate we won't press charges on you .  IMHO

Dude ; you are way off the mark !! Do you honestly think the mass AG spent all this time and resources since September culminating in a raid, without the facts to make it stick ? The substantial charges are the money laundering and the deriving financial benefit from prostitution. I have not heard if the 2 are still incarcerated. There is a cash bail. I am unsure if the 2 have financial resources to fight it all the way through the appeal process .

The AG has to be able to identify who sent the text or emails, not just whose phone it was sent from, or whose computer.  Not as slam dunk as you think.  In fact sicking the IRS on them is generally more of a concern to a defendant.

I once left an appointment 4-5 years ago with a lady from out of town working in a very nice hotel with  200 rooms and 5 elevators at least and she was pretty, classy quiet and very discreet.