I have a question for the Board on overall looks scoring. I was lucky to have wonderful hobbying this year, visiting with great ladies in Boston, New York, Florida, Toronto and even Dubai. I tend to do my homework and I gave 11 out of 12 ladies performance scores of 9, based on the St. Barts scale. In general, the ladies provided great DFK, BBBJ, DATY, nice CFS, and, with the exception of a few, CIM. My question is on the Looks score, where the average across my 12 reviews was an 8 (hot). I do have to admit that I am generous with the Looks score. I do not tend to penalize the ladies for a bit too much here and there, wide curves, and droopy boobs, especially if they give great performance. What do others think? There is no St. Barts scale for looks: beauty is an individual thing. However, should we/I be using ratings of 7 (attractive) or even 6 (nice) more frequently? I sometimes mention looks flaws in the details section but generally don't mark the ladies down on the looks score. My goal is not to hurt business for anyone, but have fun, and provide good info to the community.
Looks scores are arbitrary at best based on the reviewer's personal preference and, as you said, the gal's performance. I much prefer to see a description of the lady in the body of the review.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!