: Boston Discussion : I don't know anyone technically monogamous..

escalade1964 65 Reviews 673 reads

posted 13 years ago

1 / 10

Does "Monogomy" exist or are we more normal?

Probably a bad question to ask on an "Escort Board" ;

1.marriage to one person: the practice of being married to only one person at a time
2.practice of having one sexual partner: the practice of having a sexual relationship with only one partner during a period of time
3.practice of having one mate: the practice of having only one mate at a time or during a lifetime

Do you think it exists and to what percentage?

Your thoughts if any?

crystalforfun See my TER Reviews 512 reads

posted 13 years ago

2 / 10

once again think before hitting the blue button (eom)

END OF MESSAGE

om4swgas 500 reads

posted 13 years ago

3 / 10

DUDE...you need to get a life away from this one!!! just sayin' (e)

END OF MESSAGE

skyjockey 65 Reviews 549 reads

posted 13 years ago

4 / 10

A better question might be ......

Is this cheating if you are married?

I am only doing this because I am NOT married at this time. Using the moment to see and try things too afraid to ask being married. If I am with someone in a serious relationship I put this world on hold.

Just how I am

clearthynker 306 Reviews 563 reads

posted 13 years ago

5 / 10

There's a loophole in your provided definition

Your definition seems to provide the loophole that we need. In items two it said the following:

2.practice of having one sexual partner: the practice of having a sexual relationship with only one partner during a period of time

In my case by your definition, I was monogamous yesterday with Maay Lee and was monogamous with Woori last week and was monogamous with Daphne a couple of weeks ago. Monogamous isn't so bad after all.

GraceShepherd See my TER Reviews 483 reads

posted 13 years ago

6 / 10

Who is "we" is there a mouse in your pocket? -e-

END OF MESSAGE

escalade1964 65 Reviews 490 reads

posted 13 years ago

7 / 10

Re: Who is "we" is there a mouse in your pocket? -e-

"we" would mean "us" (hobbyist/providers)

or those that are in a marriage or long term relationship that are NOT monogamous.

escalade1964 65 Reviews 400 reads

posted 13 years ago

8 / 10

Re: There's a loophole in your provided definition

LOL

I Love loophole's

I think it is "long term" relationships. sir!

whitneywilcoxx See my TER Reviews 455 reads

posted 13 years ago

9 / 10

I think it does.

Just as country mouse may never understand the ways and beliefs of city mouse, I think that in this hobby, both hobbyist and provider, we forget that there are people unlike us out there. I hope to one day go back to a normal civilian life, likely not completely vanilla though. There are a lot more people out there who have never physically cheated than we realize, again, because of our view from being in the hobby, or just from our life experiences.

I think there's definitely a comfort in that level of intimacy, sharing your sex life with only one person. The key is to marry someone you want to continue fucking into your golden years. My little opinion.

Call me old fashioned, or delusional, whatever... lol

xx

Whitney

hauteconfidante See my TER Reviews 456 reads

posted 13 years ago

10 / 10

I don't know anyone technically monogamous..

People forget that true monogamy is one mate -- ONE -- forever. So unless you married your high school sweetheart, even if you don't hobby/cheat/are poly, at best you can only be considered a "serial monogamist."