Boston

Compromise? Why?
Bostonguy57 48 Reviews 1625 reads
posted

She wants what she wants. Just as we do.  The difference is that she holds the cards here. If you don't want to give her the information she wants that's fine, just move on.

riprodney2517 reads

I am really disappointed. I have heard really great things about Amanda. I may have went overboard on trying to schedule with her. After a week of emails back and forth to book an appointment with this Amanda Playmate I still have no appointment. She would not give in on her screening process. She kept shooting me down. All week I have tried to send her different ideas on how to verify me and because I have no way of letting her verify my work she will not see me. I am not giving out that info. I can be date checked and have references. Trying to get a date with this chick is like passing a CIA security clearance. Wonderful reviews or not I am not comfortable with giving out work information. Good luck. Though she seems very nice she expects too much information. She is not only UTR but she is staunch on her screening.

anon76588491610 reads

It's your loss. Only lazy, or imbecilic providers allow any jackass with cash to walk  into their room. Busts happen all too frequently. Give the lady a round of kudos for having a brain, and putting her safety above a few Benjamins. You win this week's jackass award!

NO, I don't see a problem, it appears to be pretty straight-forward.  Why should she see you if she is not comfortable about the meeting?

If you provide all sorts of info and for some reason just cannot provide your work info there should be a compromise between you and provider.

She wants what she wants. Just as we do.  The difference is that she holds the cards here. If you don't want to give her the information she wants that's fine, just move on.

Given you haven't even used your real screen name... in any case, there's no point getting upset about the screening process. If it doesn't work for you, don't do it, if it doesn't work for her, she shouldn't do it, either. I personally don't blame the women for their procedures and I don't blame guys who don't want to go through it, either. There are plenty of women out there who will take your money for an hour with your references, nobody should take the process personally.

First of all you don't have the natz to use your screen name to whine about something that has been brought up more often than tax relief (from both sides of the coin).

It is the lady's PERROGATIVE to use whatever screening process she so desires and makes her feel comfortable. If she has strict rules and you don't like them then simply move on! Do you whine at the bartender when he has announced last call and then removes your drink because you didn't think he meant what he said?

Many guys don't feel comfortable about giving out their personal information - which is their choice - and there are any number of ladies that they won't get to spend time with.

My personal feelings are if a lady doesn't verify, or does a really skimpy job of it then I get very nervous and will probably not make an appointment to meet her. Those are the gals that will undoubtedly get busted at some point and i don't want to be in the room when the door gets broken down or questioned as I'm walking down the hallway. It's a two way street and I'm personally a LOT happier spending time with a lady that does a real verification before she agrees to meet.

-- Modified on 6/13/2008 7:48:15 PM

>> First of all you don't have the natz to use your screen name

Gee, a guy who is concerned about maintaining his privacy uses a standard feature of the forum in order to ... maintain his privacy.

He sure is an ass.

Everyone jumping down this guy's throat ought to remember that this forum is for sharing information.  I don't don't see amanda's website stating that she is super-strict about requiring personal information - in fact the one FAQ entry there suggests otherwise.

At the very least, this guy's 'whine' is useful information to anyone else who cares about their own privacy to just look somewhere else instead of getting partially invested and wasting both party's time.

She is actually very up front about her strict screening on her contact page, which is, after all, where one would go to "contact" her.  Furthermore, the OP admits that he tried to convince her to back-off on her screening and she would not.  

There is nothing informative in the original post. It is simply a guy bitching that he can't see the lady he wants to see because he is unwilling to give her the information she requires for screening.

You are right.  I skimmed that page and looked for the mandatory red dots next to the fields like "Company Name" and not seeing them, I assumed they weren't mandatory.  I should have read closer.

I think there a compromise....somewhat.  Can you not use a site to verify your information ONCE and then have providers use that service?  I don't know the ins and outs of the process, I've just seen it talked about a couple of times.  If it works like I think it might work then you only need to give out your info ONCE, not to each and every provider.  TER whitelist....can you use something like that?

But as other people have said, it's her decision, it's her security and safety so just accept her requirements and move on.

Register Now!