The assault on this poor girl's character has resurfaced on TBD Boston. I don't post there anymore since I was told by a source in a NH courthouse that the person who dropped the dime on NH Kitty and caused her to be busted was, almost certainly, a "respected poster" on TBD Boston. The same "respected poster" is he who led the attack on CB, who recently revealed financial interests in several out of town agencies whose girls he reviewed and who, in his role as "The Red Queen" of TBD Boston, keeps a tight grip on who can say what about whom on "his" board. Keep all of this in mind when you decide if it's safe to trust him with the information TBD's servers can get from your browser when you post there. NH Kitty was a belligerent pain in the butt, but she didn't deserve to be busted. Do you remember her flame wars with "The Red Queen?" She was also too unsophisticated to hide her cookie crumbs, and that was, apparently, her undoing. I've never made this kind of provocative post before, but it has to be said. I hope I don't end up regreting this post when the TBD mafia seeks revenge. I saw CB once, she was cute, and a good but not great time, nothing to be "very afraid" of. Consider the source. She probably just refused to give special rates to TBD insiders.

I have never posted publicly about Christina Baker.  But I am all too familiar with this incident.  Since 'prolong' raised the question -- and only because he raised it -- I will tell my side of the story...

I have no idea what he is referring to concerning "The Red Queen" or even why that's relevant.  It seems to me that the relevant issue is his contention that, "The assault on this poor girl's character has resurfaced on TBD Boston."  

I don't know exactly what "resurfacing" he's referring to.  Having searched the TBD board, I found no recent posts about Christina (or Laura Stinson, who is rumored to be the reincarnation of Christina Baker).  But perhaps there were some relevant posts I didn't see that were deleted...  

The most recent post that I found with reference to Christina/Laura was an ISO on January 27.  This may be the post to which 'prolong' refers, although it is not strictly recent by my standards.  There were several responses that were negative, one of which alleged certain improprieties concerning release of confidential client information...

http://public1.boards.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/boston/msgs/posts/32305.html

Another post on January 16 made similar unsubstantiated claims and strongly suggested that hobbyists avoid Christina/Laura:

http://public1.boards.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/boston/msgs/posts/31751.html

The original public allegation appeared on June 24 of last year and was immediately heavily edited by the Boston moderator, who then posted the following:

http://public1.boards.bigdoggie.net/messageboards/boston/msgs/posts/20717.html

There are two ways to interpret these posts.  One is that someone (or some group) is conducting a smear campaign against Christina/Laura...  and that this someone may be a "TBD mafia" that would be motivated to seek revenge.  

The other possibility is that where there is smoke, there is fire...  and that some real impropriety occurred...  but that those making the allegations did not go into details so as to keep these details private.

I can confirm that the latter is the case.  At 1:20 am on a Friday night in early March of last year, my wife and I received a phone call.  She answered and listened while a party on the other end said something.  She then asked, "Who is this?", got no answer, and hung up.  She assumed that it was a crank call, but when she relayed the other party's brief message to me, I immediately recognized the reference and knew that it was no ordinary crank call.

Two others received similar calls.  With the help of the Boston moderator, we determined the identity of the caller and the means by which he got our names and home phone numbers.  This same man also made a subsequent threat to "out" several of us to the media.  

We are quite certain that Christina gave this man our confidential information.  The post by the Boston moderator references her admission to that effect, although she evidently later recanted her statement.  

As far as I am concerned, this whole incident is history.  If Christina did release information -- and I personally am positive that she did -- I am quite sure that she would never be so stupid or careless as to do it again.  I am a forgiving person, and I forgive her for her extreme error in judgment.  

Nonetheless, I condemn the reprehensible release of my private information to another party.  I have exchanged numerous emails with the man in question.  We have jointly agreed that this incident -- however misguided and unfortunate it was -- is now history.

I have no vendetta whatsoever against Christina.  In fact, I never saw her; she had my private information only because I had inquired with the intention of seeing her.  But our schedules never coincided...

I note that some others have seen Christina/Laura subsequently and have been favorably impressed.  Perhaps she has learned a good lession about discretion and confidentiality.  It may be that there is absolutely no reason to be concerned about seeing her.  That is for each man to decide.  Obviously, I will not choose to ever see her...  the memory of that incident is still all too vivid.

Personally, I hope that clients do see her and have a good time, so that she can get on with her life.  If she has the means to be a good escort, I would hate to see her reputation ruined by one moment of incredible indiscretion.  Nonetheless, I feel I have an obligation to the hobbying community to raise this issue as a potential warning flag...

Lastly, 'prolong' makes a number of unsubstantiated insinuations in his post.  I have no information about many of these, so I have no comment.  It is his right to post, and our obligation to weigh what we believe to be true.  But I assure you 'prolong' that no TBD mafia will seek revenge for such a post.  

The TBD mafia -- if such a thing exists -- may well come down very hard -- seek revenge if you will -- on the release of confidential information, unwarranted phone calls to a hobbyist's house, and a threat to 'out' hobbyists to the media...  but every man and woman has a right to post his or her opinions...

Have fun, MG

Dear MG,

I thank you for coming out and "finally explaining to me" what
this was all about last summer.   I had many pieces of the puzzle,
but was never exactly sure what this was all about ( and no one- surprisingly - ever asked my side of the story).

I will tell you one thing for sure:   I do NOT know who you are,
I never knew your posting name, and therefore - i also never
had "your name" - work address - let alone give it to gungrunt

I would swear these facts in front of a judge or in court.  

"Your specific info" - i never gave out.  Heck, I don't even know who you are!  ( other than the fact you are a well respected poster on tbd).  

And to be honestly speaking, i never did really verify people
last year - at all.   Those who gave me info did so of their own volition.  


Well, there has to be another provider then  - that gungrunt got these facts from( if its indeed you are talking about him - that
called you on the phone).


Its seems a bit weird, but i guess possible that he did it, being
that he did call another providers parents and boyfriend ( a former girl from quality sweets) - and revealed facts to the family that she was an escort ( which he did admit to me btw) several years ago.

I remember afterdark stating what a "sweet man" gungrunt always seemed to be.  



However, i have to tell you at the same token, that in january of 2001 ( i guess a tbd poster by the name of popeye doyle or popeye did an anonymous review on me - and your name was somehow involved in the thread ) -  gungrunt "did indeed ask me"  - if i ever saw someone by the name of mature gentleman - i told him NO.  


I looked back through all my emails and did not see that name on any of them.  



Well, thanks for explaining to me what this was all about.



Anyone who wants to hear "my side of the story ( and i will be frank with you like i did with several TBDers last year and this year as well - in being truthful) - i would be happy to share with you.


just email me or call.


As for MG - sorry to say MG - but    "your specific  info" - gungrunt must have gotten it from another party.    


It was not me.  


The same for Boophatty who posted on tbd as well - Your Info too  - i did not give to gungrunt - I did not know you either ( as "far as i know" ).


I am being very serious here and i take these public allegations seriously.  

It has seriously damaged and harmed my reputation in the community.


To BD13 - i never threatened you .  Please reread the mails i sent to you.   I have shown them to others last summer.  Perhaps
I was writing in haste or upsetness.  But i never threatened you directly.

All i was talking about was a particular agency i used to work for ( and it does not take rocket science to figure out which one it was)  - a lady who used to be  a copartner there- gave out my ( and linda of bostons name too ) real name, where i lived, place of internship/employment  - to clients . I am serious.  When i showed up at the door, they announced my real name after a few minutes of discussion, as well as other pertinant facts about me i asked this agency not to reveal.        



The worst sins are the sins of the tongue - when you damage someones reputation, you can NEVER take that back.  


I am not this kind of person to randomly give out names,
and threaten people people are claiming.  

I take this very seriously ( these public allegations in writing).


Again, those who wish to finally hear "my side of the story " - do not hesitate to email or write or call.


Sincerely yours,


Christina Baker
[email protected]

"the accused" - gungrunt - ran an agency called "belle de jour"
from spring of 2000 - to fall of 2000 online and in upscale publications.


It involved myself, a woman named carrie/carrie hot and another girl from jillsinternational.com/aa-escort.com ( kiana - i believe)

I do know for a fact he was booking and verifying calls
for carrie and kiana ( i just paid him for the advertising).


so this is "very well possible" - how he obtained other names, contact info, etc, of MG, boophatty, etc.


CB~

Hello All,

I am reading the posts about me ( and from bhoophatty)
= i really need to step in and attempt to clear this all up.

I have posted extensively on TBD regarding all this.  

I in NO WAY shape or form - gave a datbase of numbers ot gungrunt.  

I did NOT supply him with complete names, addresses, etc.

He did verify a few calls for me at times ( being i was listed on his agency/site ) .

He most likely got these list of names because he was running an agency called "belle dejour" -   it was "more than a listing service" - it was an agency.  

Just like gungrunt claims he got expelled from the boston board because a woman he lived with posted in his hame and it was her that got expelled.

Possible, but highly unlikely and incredibly unbelievable.


If you wish to hear more of my side of the  story, please read my posts on TBD.  There is more to write here, but
there is only so much i can explain in one or two posts.  

To accuse me of these things - is somewhat slanderous - although i realize that i should have never got involved with this man and was warned long ago to stay away.


Its amazing how an affiliation with one gentleman can lead to such a tragedy in a girls life.  

I am a very safe person to be with and i really need to step in and defend myself here.


Sincerely,

Christina~

ps - i NEVER supplied gungrunt with a database of names, and numbers, etc.