Looks kind of "scammy" to me.

that's a line from the movie "The Fly" ... btw

be wary of sites with gratuitous pics (photos of dubious origin) which this website has in spades. for example, the "Sylvia Saint" lookalike on the front page (who is she? what's her name?) or the middle picture which is taken from the stock work of a "legitimate" glamour photographer by name of Paul Hart

http://www.agencyusa.com/html/paul_hart.html


what are the odds that the girl in the modeling agency turned to escorting and then authorized her photos to be displayed (anonymously) on this website?

called the agency and was told the massage and girls company was $$ and any thing else was extra, I said no thanks.

very wise move.  Do your homework.  Use the search feature and cross-reference agency #, providers listed, etc.  If there are no reviews, or reviews where the review is the only one posted by the hobbyist, RUN AWAY!!

There are too many quality, well reviewed, indies/agencies available and it's not worth it to "take a chance" and get ripped-off.

Forewarned is forearmed.

I called the agency and booked an incall appointment for the Providence area. They said "Victoria"  (she does not have a picture on the web site) or Robyn (she does have a pic)would be available. I chose Victoria because she is petite (I'm a short guy). You can read my review on Escorts.com (I'm Happymouse there), but I 'll give you the basics here: they said Victoria was 25, she looks more like 35, with a little baby fat and fair looking. She was attentive and gave a fair service, nothing exceptional but, I guess for the fee ($200) was ok. I tried to book Laika,and they said she was available, but later I had to travel and had to change plans. If I lived in Boston, however, I would stay with Roomservice, for the same fee you get good looking girls and the reviews are good.