Recently, a cyber-friend, challenged me. You see, I had not seen this provider, Tonie, yet Tonie’s pictures had looked just great! The reason--Tonie has some very bad reviews-I have been monitoring them from the very start. One after the other, each review reviled a bad provider, nothing personal, just not the Claudia Draper type.
In her message, my friend used words like--skewed points--and--taking one on for the team. Wait, you take one on for the team before anyone has written a review. It was too late to take one on for the team with regards to Tonie.
But I found myself thinking (not a good sign). My friend referenced her own experience-I made an inference! She challenged me to dig deeper while using my personal experience. I reflected. And I was moved. One reason I volunteered to moderate this board was due in part to a bad experience I had on another board. The board that got me started in the hobby. But not just that, other threads I’ve read on some of the other boards. Threads that made suggestions and hints to the idea that some providers are singled out—misrepresented for their ethnic background—something that I’m appalled by.
MY PERSONAL TASTE
I’m not all that unique of a person, but my stature, cardio strength and my background make my taste specific and to the point. And within the range of women that turn me on, are big booty girls. They have to be a certain type too! Size, shape, proportion to waist, all are factors.
TAKING ONE ON FOR THE TEAM:
I don’t do this any more, but if you read my reviews, Cassie was one that I took on for the team. Catch me in the chat room and I’ll tell you about it.
SKEWED POINTS
For whatever reason, is it the provider or our taste in women? Of course not in ever case, most skewing takes place at the high end of the scale. I’ve found it to be anywhere from 1 to 3 points. What that means, to the experienced hobbyist, it means one reviewer could score a provider with a 5 or 6 and then the next hobbyist could take that score and know he could have a 8 or a 9 and in some cases even a 10 experience. But in most cases, skewing doesn’t come into play.
EXPERIENCE
I’d like to think that most guys in this membership are straightforward with their reviews, you know, shoot from the hip. You give them some pussy; pat them on the head and you’ll probably get a 5 or 6 for performance. I also know that if a provider doesn’t pat you on the head (and more importantly) give you the pussy—you can get pissed off. Man, that girl didn’t deliver. Her hair was dirty! Her breath Stinks! And she didn’t give me the pussy. SKEWING.
TONIE
She has 3 reviews: appearance: she scored 4, 8, 7 performance 2,3,2. There are also very bad descriptions about her weight, looks, personality and hygiene. If I were to go into a session with Tonie, my expectation would be one where I’d see a girl that would be pretty good looking—her 4 in appearance hopefully being the result of skewing, but probably a pretty bad fuck (if such a creature is possible).
-- Modified on 9/11/2002 5:24:31 PM
