I think it depends on who is reading the review for approval, as I have read a few lately that are the simple, cut and dry, reviews, and also the juicy ones as well; so I would imagine there is a little of both. Just a thought.

...that a review will not be approved without enough "juicy details" in it.

That said, I think you can also tell that reviews are approved subjectively.  The people that actually do the approving seem to have different opinions as to what constitutes a good review.

In my opinion, it is cyclical in nature.  Some will be very well-written, others are very blah.

Hell yes they made me hot , when I read about that fist and face fuck sequence geez  who wouldn't get  off on that.Hear girls claim to be freaky , you just go out and show them how high they gotta go to be known as "freaky".You setting that bar mighty high girl!
tc 2hot

With all due respect, I cannot get behind the notion that the more juicy the details the better. I've ready some reviews that have little in the way of heat.

And in some cases where the provider being reviewed, is just so bad, the "management" denies a review that is more of the same. So in reality, TER is doing its part to cover up for bad providers if only to keep reviews "juicy".

If a review is written, it should be posted. If it is fake, it should be called out after the fact.

It is pathetic to come on here, take the time to write a review, only to have it denied because it wasn't juicy enough. That being the case, why bother coming here; TER is creating an environment that is ultimately dishonest.

I've only written a few, I think only two made the cut; and twice again as many were denied. I value what little free time I have. It is hard enough to make an appointment to meet, let alone also take the time to write a review.

TER just thumbs it's noses at members with their review process; and frankly, I'm pretty well fed up.

There is competition out there that, I hear, treats its members better; and places value on the time of the people that take the time to write the reviews that is such a major selling point of this place.

not enough detail! Even though I've seen many very short reviews by others. I added an extra line and both went through. I mean really many times the experience can be great and you say that but a "nice bj and mish till I came is many times all that really happened. Of course I exagerate slightly. Every girl has unique qualities and you may click in different ways through convo, etc.  1 review I submitted 8 or 9 times because the provider tried to set me up and hit me while she speed dialed a guy waiting outside. In one attempt I mentioned she answered the phone 3 times and talked about her sick mother. I was told that info could help identify her! Isn't that the point? after I persisted with additional attempts TER finally just blantently said they would need a reviiew from another memberfor the same girl. I got ticked and asked how many ter member this girl had to rob or try to blackmail before they would post a warning review. They said they'd take it under advisement. My review on another board went up immediately! I agree with the above post that ter has some strange and inconsistant review policies. We do take the time to write reviews to help out co-members, the good providers and ter. If only 1/2 reviews get through we get reluctant to bother we pay our membership for the reviews, at least in part.  Jumping through hoops to get a pass is just ter shooting itself in the foot. That being said my expewrience with ter other than their management has been good. Meeting some nice people, both members and providers.