I noticed Cindy's review profile changed to a Scam [ripoff] . I pretty much reached the same conclusion after doing some research of my own, though "Cindy" had some positive reviews. My question is how is TER able to reach that conclusion, if clients are not allowed to post negative "reviews" of sessions that never happened? Are they reported to the moderator on the back channel?

I would love to know the policy also.  I said in a previous thread that I thought it was BS... the majority of reviews are from first time reviewers, that are, of course, all positive.

I see no negative reviews of her.

I wondered the same thing. She has a handful of decent reviews. Nothing negative at all. We’re just told ( by tag) that she’s a scam. What gives? If powers-to-be can’t give a reason then why not just delete the provider? I don’t get it.

It saves otherwise potential victims.