I'm not there to boost my ego. Although I appreciate the fact that a provider might do that to make me feel good, I would rather she not.

I would rather know if what I am doing is getting her anywhere.  You pay the money so making the woman "O" is not necessarily a deal breaker, it can also take you further and maybe get more out of the session.  These are regular women so they do get turned on to certain types of stimulation. I think it is in most men to want to  be able to "crack the code" so to speak.  It certainly can't hurt anything to bring to an actual "O".  

And even sometimes the guy might be doing everything right and still cant get the girl because she is not mentally into it.  With women it is so mental and with guys it is so physical.  Sometimes it won't matter. The better question is, would you rate a session differently if you percieved(true or not)that you got the girl to a "O"?

Re:Would you rather....?

I would like for her please not fake an O. Is she is not into the session just have a nice time. Thanks.

I'd rather go with 1) myself but I can see why 2) would be useful sometimes.

I'd rather she not fake it.  It does nothing for me and sometimes it's just too obvious which turns into a giant turn off.  

I'm sure Providers are very skilled and I have no idea what is real and what is fake but in my mind I think I've got a fair sixth sense about it.  If it's genuine I enjoy it but any faking gets me out of the mood.

It don't feel like I'm being selfish since I'm footing the bill, so at that moment I'm thinking more about my "O" than hers.

I guess it depends on the guy.

I'd much rather she not fake it. Actually, the few women I've been with know how much I love to daty, so they are guaranteed an orgasm ... even if I have to sprain my tongue, they'll get theirs. Haven't had to worry about 'is she faking' or not thus far.

Jimbo

I'd rather have her talk me through what she needs to get there and then give her what she needs so no faking would be needed.

Good Hunting!
Pheonix