not so much the other way around.  By that, I mean lack of professionalism and business sense is pervasive amongst women who fancy themselves providers.  A lot of girls stumble onto sites like these and decide to jump in feet first without a clue.  I'm reminded of this whenever I see an online catfight between 'providers'; or whenever a 'provider' launches into a childish tirade about an average review; or when I read about 'providers' not keeping appointments; or when a 'provider' asks a discussion board whether or not she should get her breasts enlarged.

There's just lots of amateurish behavior showing up around here that seems better suited for an arrangement website.  I think it takes more than multiple clients to make a girl a provider.

For a babe to get a little side cash without having to call herself a......
prostitute.

BTW there are some well reviewed providers that show up from time to time on sugar baby sites.

lol

Yes it's true (AND LEGAL)

Nope, not providers, I just wrote about this (seeing if Providers*WOULD* consider this arrangement)

ABC news did a Segment on it, one dude spends $150,000K on 7-Sugar Babies
One $5000 a month.  It's totally "Legit" *AND NOT* Illegal!! BEST PART. What makes Hobby illegal, is the "quid pro quot"Money for Sex.

Sugar Baby, you enter into an "Arrangement" to pay bills, etc. and it's "Implied" (never spoken about)---he's favored back. Naturally (like with Providers complete discretion/and no talk of "exchange" is spoken of.

I think the 2nd-Rank is complete *BS*--(another article dropped to 6th place)
They say they count by using the *.edu address. Apparently, if they use that to sign up, the women get free membership.

Also, the women on there asking 10-30K month--are "fake" (not fraud pictures)---however even the designer/owner of site says never see's that happen.

Most are typically in the Mid/High $1500+ month range. Never joined, just browsed. Just don't see it coming to a "close"  I've talked to several younger (about meeting to discuss)  Providers willing to discuss an "arrangement". It baffles me why a provider would not want to do this.  Have not met yet.

Just like with SB, they "keep their day job", it truly is an "arrangement". Other than being a "Human" (and caring about their well being). Pretty much firewall their working like with your "arrangement"

The best part is (what i like)--what's expected is a true "DATE"
First amendment Lawyer says not illegal--BECAUSE, it's not about "sex"---it's "Charity", to help through school....which happens to include "Romance"

However, for the sites that cater to that, my hunch is, that Once rubber hits's Good percentage back out/chicken out.

http://www.backslashonline.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=1038:sugar-babies-blur-line-between-prostitution-and-?&Itemid=194&tmpl=component&print=1

****************************

So is being a Sugar Baby legal? A First Amendment lawyer from Las Vegas, Allen Lichtenstein, explained to the Huffington Post that this type of arrangement is a "legal gray area when there is not an immediate exchange of cash for sex." He elaborated, "One could even consider certain marriages where there are unequal financial resources to not be overly dissimilar. But any relationship that is an ongoing one that's not purely about sex but may have a sexual aspect to it, you can't really classify as prostitution."

***************************


.