Atlanta

Re: I have not yet completely figured out
Tartus 56 Reviews 315 reads
posted

The first review I submitted was rejected and TER gave some generic explanation that said nothing.  When I saw her again a month or so later I asked her about it and she told me she had asked TER to drop her profile and NOT post reviews, and TER appears to have honored her request.  My second provider review was rejected with an explanation that I needed to be more descriptive of the intimate details-- something that goes against my upbringing of not kissing and telling-- so I got graphic despite my discomfort and TER approved it.  My third review was rejected with the same type of generic explanation as the first-- another BP girl-- so I'm guessing it was the same reason as the first-- especially since no reviews appear anywhere about her.

The dude that wrote the epic-length post introducing himself? Didn't he say he was going to start posting and writing reviews?

Just wondering if he's ever posted again or reviewed....

( no disrespect)

I'm not gonna measure his life up against what I want or don't want for myself.

I was thinking the same thing.  He posted once after, but no reviews attached to his lame handle.  I would imagine he's too busy enticing himself in his mirror as he say's his handle over, and over, and over and over.  Um, LOSER

I'll go ahead and presume I am the subject of your post and provide answer: I have submitted reviews, but they were sent back for re-write as they were not considered  graphically detailed (i.e., juicy) enough. I have been told in PM by other hobbyists this is not uncommon regarding the first submittals.  

I am satisfied with my paid membership and not seeking extra membership days per review, so I haven't been in a hurry to rework the 3 sent.  

Thanks for your interest. I appreciate the civility of your question.  

I also appreciate that you have chosen to post it using your known handle instead of inventing something new to make snide assumptions and judgments.

That practice appears to be reserved for tedious provocateurs.

It does sound like you understood. I have a rather odd sense of humor. That doesn't always get translated well when I post.

I was not offended because I was not familiar with the term as it would apply in this context.

It did cause me to spend a few moments with an urban slang search.

It seems it can be used in context of "hipster" or, more cutting, as substitute for "wigger".

I am too old to be considered qualified for the first and I certainly appreciate your tactful judgement in not using the second

Register Now!